Comparative Analysis of Control Techniques for Electric Vehicle with PMSM Motor Drives for Voltage Selection Techniques and Torque-Flux Mitigation

Q3 Engineering
Nisha Rexline R, Rajarajeswari R
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Control Techniques for Electric Vehicle with PMSM Motor Drives for Voltage Selection Techniques and Torque-Flux Mitigation","authors":"Nisha Rexline R, Rajarajeswari R","doi":"10.4271/2023-28-0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div class=\"section abstract\"><div class=\"htmlview paragraph\">The fast dynamic response is a vital requisite for the operation of automotive drives. Various control schemes for electric vehicles (EV) have been proposed over time, and vector control is one of the popular techniques among them. Direct Torque Control (DTC) and Model Predictive Current Control (MPCC) were some of the vector control methods analyzed for their ripples in flux and torque, which in turn affect the performance of the EV is discussed in this paper. The DTC method uses the predefined voltage vector (VV) table to decide the Active voltage vector adjacent to the reference voltage vector from the table; this can also improve the flux response and torque ripple. Furthermore, the switching frequency reduction can be made by incorporating the null voltage vector in the switching sequence. The MPCC is employed for the PMSM machine model to reduce the error between the assumed reference and predicted value using the cost function by choosing one optimum vector. A modified MPCC technique is used in the paper, where two voltage vectors are applied in a single sample interval. This is used to improve the steady-state performance of the system. Based on specific scenarios, a comparison of modified MPCC and DTC techniques is made for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM). The PMSM has good dynamic performance and power density, suitable for EV applications. The simulation results are used to compare the effectiveness of both methods for their torque and flux mitigation, and their comparisons are presented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38377,"journal":{"name":"SAE Technical Papers","volume":" 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE Technical Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2023-28-0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fast dynamic response is a vital requisite for the operation of automotive drives. Various control schemes for electric vehicles (EV) have been proposed over time, and vector control is one of the popular techniques among them. Direct Torque Control (DTC) and Model Predictive Current Control (MPCC) were some of the vector control methods analyzed for their ripples in flux and torque, which in turn affect the performance of the EV is discussed in this paper. The DTC method uses the predefined voltage vector (VV) table to decide the Active voltage vector adjacent to the reference voltage vector from the table; this can also improve the flux response and torque ripple. Furthermore, the switching frequency reduction can be made by incorporating the null voltage vector in the switching sequence. The MPCC is employed for the PMSM machine model to reduce the error between the assumed reference and predicted value using the cost function by choosing one optimum vector. A modified MPCC technique is used in the paper, where two voltage vectors are applied in a single sample interval. This is used to improve the steady-state performance of the system. Based on specific scenarios, a comparison of modified MPCC and DTC techniques is made for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM). The PMSM has good dynamic performance and power density, suitable for EV applications. The simulation results are used to compare the effectiveness of both methods for their torque and flux mitigation, and their comparisons are presented.
永磁同步电机驱动电动汽车控制技术的电压选择与转矩磁链抑制对比分析
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">快速的动态响应是汽车传动系统运行的重要条件。随着时间的推移,人们提出了各种电动汽车的控制方案,矢量控制是其中比较流行的一种控制技术。本文分析了直接转矩控制(DTC)和模型预测电流控制(MPCC)两种矢量控制方法的磁链和转矩波动对电动汽车性能的影响。DTC方法使用预定义的电压矢量(VV)表,从表中确定与参考电压矢量相邻的主动电压矢量;这也可以改善磁链响应和转矩脉动。此外,可以通过在开关序列中加入零电压矢量来降低开关频率。将MPCC算法应用于PMSM电机模型中,通过选择一个最优向量来减小假设参考值与使用代价函数的预测值之间的误差。本文使用了一种改进的MPCC技术,其中两个电压矢量在单个采样间隔内施加。这是用来提高系统的稳态性能。针对永磁同步电机的具体应用场景,对改进的MPCC技术和直接转矩控制技术进行了比较。该永磁同步电机具有良好的动态性能和功率密度,适合电动汽车应用。利用仿真结果比较了两种方法在减小转矩和磁通方面的有效性,并给出了比较结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAE Technical Papers
SAE Technical Papers Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1487
期刊介绍: SAE Technical Papers are written and peer-reviewed by experts in the automotive, aerospace, and commercial vehicle industries. Browse the more than 102,000 technical papers and journal articles on the latest advances in technical research and applied technical engineering information below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信