Sympathy and the Self in William Godwin’s Mandeville (1817)

Colin Azariah-Kribbs
{"title":"Sympathy and the Self in William Godwin’s <i>Mandeville</i> (1817)","authors":"Colin Azariah-Kribbs","doi":"10.3828/eir.2023.30.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his Gothic novel Mandeville (1817), the radical political philosopher and author William Godwin presents a complex and compassionate depiction of the imaginative formation of individual selfhood and the way in which the limits of sympathy and the nature of selfhood operate to violently separate the individual from social sympathy. Godwin employs the coercive language of property and wounds to describe his eponymous protagonist’s experience and imaginative conceptualization of sympathy as a violent loss of selfhood; Charles Mandeville thus desires and fears social sympathy, imagining it as a threat against the privacy and integrity of his selfhood. The extreme nature of Mandeville’s desire for and aversion to sympathy demonstrates Godwin’s increasing reluctance to reconcile his interest in a radically private and imaginative selfhood with his theory that the imagination can and should in some way be controlled, expansive, empathetic, and social—in other words, transformed into a sympathetic and socially useful imagination, as described by theorists like Adam Smith and Joanna Baillie. Mandeville further reveals Godwin’s frustration with more optimistic theories of sympathy, depicting a character touched by political, physical, and psychological traumas, unable to solicit sympathy and never freely given sympathy except by manipulators. In Mandeville, Godwin offers a portrait of the conflicting and fundamentally irreconcilable relationship between the imaginative individual and social sympathy, one that both develops his own view of the complex relationship between the individual and community while deconstructing more utopian Romantic visions of the self and sympathy.","PeriodicalId":281500,"journal":{"name":"Essays in Romanticism","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Essays in Romanticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/eir.2023.30.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his Gothic novel Mandeville (1817), the radical political philosopher and author William Godwin presents a complex and compassionate depiction of the imaginative formation of individual selfhood and the way in which the limits of sympathy and the nature of selfhood operate to violently separate the individual from social sympathy. Godwin employs the coercive language of property and wounds to describe his eponymous protagonist’s experience and imaginative conceptualization of sympathy as a violent loss of selfhood; Charles Mandeville thus desires and fears social sympathy, imagining it as a threat against the privacy and integrity of his selfhood. The extreme nature of Mandeville’s desire for and aversion to sympathy demonstrates Godwin’s increasing reluctance to reconcile his interest in a radically private and imaginative selfhood with his theory that the imagination can and should in some way be controlled, expansive, empathetic, and social—in other words, transformed into a sympathetic and socially useful imagination, as described by theorists like Adam Smith and Joanna Baillie. Mandeville further reveals Godwin’s frustration with more optimistic theories of sympathy, depicting a character touched by political, physical, and psychological traumas, unable to solicit sympathy and never freely given sympathy except by manipulators. In Mandeville, Godwin offers a portrait of the conflicting and fundamentally irreconcilable relationship between the imaginative individual and social sympathy, one that both develops his own view of the complex relationship between the individual and community while deconstructing more utopian Romantic visions of the self and sympathy.
威廉·戈德温《曼德维尔》中的同情与自我
激进的政治哲学家兼作家威廉·戈德温在他的哥特式小说《曼德维尔》(1817)中,以复杂而富有同情心的方式描绘了个人自我的想象形成,以及同情的局限性和自我的本质如何将个人与社会同情粗暴地分离开来。戈德温使用财产和伤口的强制性语言来描述他的同名主人公的经历和富有想象力的同情概念,作为一种暴力的自我丧失;因此,查尔斯·曼德维尔既渴望又害怕社会同情,把它想象成对他的隐私和人格完整性的威胁。曼德维尔对同情的渴望和厌恶的极端本质表明,戈德温越来越不愿意调和他对激进的私人和想象的自我的兴趣,以及他的理论,即想象可以而且应该在某种程度上被控制、扩展、移情和社交——换句话说,转化为一种富有同情心和对社会有用的想象,正如亚当·斯密和乔安娜·贝利等理论家所描述的那样。曼德维尔进一步揭示了戈德温对更乐观的同情理论的失望,描绘了一个被政治、身体和心理创伤所触动的角色,无法乞求同情,除非是操纵者,否则永远不会自由地给予同情。在《曼德维尔》中,戈德温描绘了富有想象力的个人与社会同情之间冲突和根本不可调和的关系,他对个人与社会之间的复杂关系发展了自己的观点,同时解构了更多乌托邦式的浪漫主义自我与同情的愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信