Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy operations with stenting of the carotid arteries: a systematic review

Q4 Medicine
Abdusalom Abdurakhmanov, Farhad Mamataliev, Shuxrat Salakhitdinov, Oybek Mashrapov, Saidjalol Tursunov, Odilbek Sultanov
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy operations with stenting of the carotid arteries: a systematic review","authors":"Abdusalom Abdurakhmanov, Farhad Mamataliev, Shuxrat Salakhitdinov, Oybek Mashrapov, Saidjalol Tursunov, Odilbek Sultanov","doi":"10.24969/hvt.2023.413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More than ten international randomized trials have been conducted to determine the effectiveness and safety of carotid artery stenting and comparing the latter with the results of carotid endarterectomy. However, some of them obtained conflicting data confirming both the advantage of carotid stenting (SAPPHIRE) and carotid endarterectomy (EVA-3S), as well as the equivalence of the two treatments (CAVATAS, SPACE, CREST). Also, unsatisfactory results of both single-stage and staged surgical approaches were shown in the treatment of patients with combined atherosclerotic lesions of the coronary and carotid arteries. The lack of clear international guidelines for the management of patients with lesions of several vascular beds makes it necessary to look for new methods of surgical treatment based on minimally invasive endovascular technologies. This review article analyzes the results of randomized trials comparing the results of carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in patients with carotid atherosclerosis.","PeriodicalId":32453,"journal":{"name":"Heart Vessels and Transplantation","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Vessels and Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24969/hvt.2023.413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More than ten international randomized trials have been conducted to determine the effectiveness and safety of carotid artery stenting and comparing the latter with the results of carotid endarterectomy. However, some of them obtained conflicting data confirming both the advantage of carotid stenting (SAPPHIRE) and carotid endarterectomy (EVA-3S), as well as the equivalence of the two treatments (CAVATAS, SPACE, CREST). Also, unsatisfactory results of both single-stage and staged surgical approaches were shown in the treatment of patients with combined atherosclerotic lesions of the coronary and carotid arteries. The lack of clear international guidelines for the management of patients with lesions of several vascular beds makes it necessary to look for new methods of surgical treatment based on minimally invasive endovascular technologies. This review article analyzes the results of randomized trials comparing the results of carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in patients with carotid atherosclerosis.
颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术疗效的比较分析:系统回顾
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信