Comparison of the Effect of the Same Polishing Method on the Surface Roughness of Conventional, CAD/CAM Milling and 3D Printing Denture Base Materials

Q3 Dentistry
DEMİRKOL, Didem , TUĞUT, Faik
{"title":"Comparison of the Effect of the Same Polishing Method on the Surface Roughness of Conventional, CAD/CAM Milling and 3D Printing Denture Base Materials","authors":"DEMİRKOL, Didem\n , TUĞUT, Faik\n ","doi":"10.7126/cumudj.1317851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of both the same polishing method and those with and without thermal aging on the surface roughness of conventional, CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing denture base materials.
 Materials and Methods: A total of 30 round shaped specimens were obtained by 3 different methods (n=10): Conventional, CAD/CAM milling and 3D-Printing. After applying the same polishing technique to all groups, surface roughness values were measured. Profilometer device was used for surface roughness measurement. Then, after the thermal aging of all samples, surface roughness values were measured and the roughness values between no-thermocycling and thermocycling were compared. Tukey, Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests were used statistically. P values of ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. 
 Results: As a result of the same polishing process, there was a difference in surface roughness in all groups. While the highest surface roughness values were seen in 3D-printing, the lowest roughness value was seen in the CAD/CAM milling and was statistically significant (p<0.05). Thermocycling did not show a statistically significant difference in surface roughness (p>0.05).
 Conclusions: The same polishing process caused different surface roughness values in the denture base materials obtained with different methods, and the lowest surface roughness value was seen in the CAD/CAM milling.","PeriodicalId":10781,"journal":{"name":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1317851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of both the same polishing method and those with and without thermal aging on the surface roughness of conventional, CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing denture base materials. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 round shaped specimens were obtained by 3 different methods (n=10): Conventional, CAD/CAM milling and 3D-Printing. After applying the same polishing technique to all groups, surface roughness values were measured. Profilometer device was used for surface roughness measurement. Then, after the thermal aging of all samples, surface roughness values were measured and the roughness values between no-thermocycling and thermocycling were compared. Tukey, Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests were used statistically. P values of ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. Results: As a result of the same polishing process, there was a difference in surface roughness in all groups. While the highest surface roughness values were seen in 3D-printing, the lowest roughness value was seen in the CAD/CAM milling and was statistically significant (p<0.05). Thermocycling did not show a statistically significant difference in surface roughness (p>0.05). Conclusions: The same polishing process caused different surface roughness values in the denture base materials obtained with different methods, and the lowest surface roughness value was seen in the CAD/CAM milling.
相同抛光方法对传统、CAD/CAM铣削和3D打印义齿基托材料表面粗糙度影响的比较
目的:本研究的目的是评估相同抛光方法和经过和不经过热老化的方法对传统、CAD/CAM铣削和3D打印义齿基托材料表面粗糙度的影响。材料和方法:采用常规、CAD/CAM铣削和3d打印3种不同的方法(n=10),共获得30个圆形试样。在对所有组应用相同的抛光技术后,测量表面粗糙度值。表面粗糙度测量采用轮廓仪装置。然后,对所有样品进行热老化后的表面粗糙度值进行测量,并对不热循环和热循环的粗糙度值进行比较。采用Tukey、Mann Whitney U和Kruskal Wallis检验进行统计学分析。P值≤0.05为显著性。& # x0D;结果:由于抛光过程相同,各组表面粗糙度存在差异。虽然3d打印的表面粗糙度值最高,但CAD/CAM铣削的表面粗糙度值最低,并且具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。热循环在表面粗糙度方面没有统计学上的显著差异(p>0.05)。结论:相同的抛光过程导致不同方法获得的义齿基托材料表面粗糙度值不同,CAD/CAM铣削时表面粗糙度值最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信