Post-quantum cryptographic assemblages and the governance of the quantum threat

IF 2.9 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Kristen Csenkey, Nina Bindel
{"title":"Post-quantum cryptographic assemblages and the governance of the quantum threat","authors":"Kristen Csenkey, Nina Bindel","doi":"10.1093/cybsec/tyad001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Threats against security in the Internet often have a wide range and can have serious impacts within society. Large quantum computers will be able to break the cryptographic algorithms used to ensure security today, which is known as the quantum threat. Quantum threats are multi-faceted and very complex cybersecurity issues. We use assemblage theory to explore the complexities associated with these threats, including how they are understood within policy and strategy. It is in this way that we explore how the governance of the quantum threat is made visible. Generally, the private and academic sectors have been a primary driver in this field, but other actors (especially states) have begun to grapple with the threat and have begun to understand the relation to defence challenges, and pathways to cooperation in order to prepare against the threat. This may pose challenges for traditional avenues of defence cooperation as states attempt to understand and manage the associated technologies and perceived threats. We examine how traditionally cooperating allies attempt to govern the quantum threat by focusing on Australia, Canada, European Union, New Zealand, UK, and USA. We explore the linkages within post-quantum cryptographic assemblages and identify several governmental interventions as attempts to understand and manage the threat and associated technologies. In examining over 40 policy and strategy-related documents between traditionally defence cooperating allies, we identify six main linkages: Infrastructure, Standardization, Education, Partnerships, Economy, and Defence. These linkages highlight the governmental interventions to govern through standardization and regulation as a way to define the contours of the quantum threat.","PeriodicalId":44310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cybersecurity","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cybersecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyad001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Threats against security in the Internet often have a wide range and can have serious impacts within society. Large quantum computers will be able to break the cryptographic algorithms used to ensure security today, which is known as the quantum threat. Quantum threats are multi-faceted and very complex cybersecurity issues. We use assemblage theory to explore the complexities associated with these threats, including how they are understood within policy and strategy. It is in this way that we explore how the governance of the quantum threat is made visible. Generally, the private and academic sectors have been a primary driver in this field, but other actors (especially states) have begun to grapple with the threat and have begun to understand the relation to defence challenges, and pathways to cooperation in order to prepare against the threat. This may pose challenges for traditional avenues of defence cooperation as states attempt to understand and manage the associated technologies and perceived threats. We examine how traditionally cooperating allies attempt to govern the quantum threat by focusing on Australia, Canada, European Union, New Zealand, UK, and USA. We explore the linkages within post-quantum cryptographic assemblages and identify several governmental interventions as attempts to understand and manage the threat and associated technologies. In examining over 40 policy and strategy-related documents between traditionally defence cooperating allies, we identify six main linkages: Infrastructure, Standardization, Education, Partnerships, Economy, and Defence. These linkages highlight the governmental interventions to govern through standardization and regulation as a way to define the contours of the quantum threat.
后量子密码组合和量子威胁的治理
互联网上的安全威胁往往涉及面广,会对社会造成严重影响。大型量子计算机将能够破解目前用于确保安全的加密算法,这被称为量子威胁。量子威胁是多方面的、非常复杂的网络安全问题。我们使用组合理论来探索与这些威胁相关的复杂性,包括如何在政策和战略中理解它们。正是通过这种方式,我们探索了如何使量子威胁的治理变得可见。一般来说,私营和学术部门一直是这一领域的主要驱动力,但其他行为者(特别是国家)已经开始努力应对这一威胁,并开始了解与国防挑战的关系,以及为应对威胁而进行合作的途径。随着各国试图理解和管理相关技术和感知到的威胁,这可能对传统的防务合作途径构成挑战。我们通过关注澳大利亚、加拿大、欧盟、新西兰、英国和美国来研究传统合作盟友如何试图治理量子威胁。我们探讨了后量子密码组合中的联系,并确定了一些政府干预措施,试图理解和管理威胁和相关技术。在研究了传统防务合作盟友之间的40多个政策和战略相关文件后,我们确定了六个主要联系:基础设施、标准化、教育、伙伴关系、经济和国防。这些联系突出了政府干预,通过标准化和监管来界定量子威胁的轮廓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cybersecurity
Journal of Cybersecurity SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cybersecurity provides a hub around which the interdisciplinary cybersecurity community can form. The journal is committed to providing quality empirical research, as well as scholarship, that is grounded in real-world implications and solutions. Journal of Cybersecurity solicits articles adhering to the following, broadly constructed and interpreted, aspects of cybersecurity: anthropological and cultural studies; computer science and security; security and crime science; cryptography and associated topics; security economics; human factors and psychology; legal aspects of information security; political and policy perspectives; strategy and international relations; and privacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信