An Exploration of Officer Gender and Use of Force Incidents in a Transit Police Department

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Natalie Schell-Busey, Carla Lewandowski, Kimberly Houser, Evan Sorg
{"title":"An Exploration of Officer Gender and Use of Force Incidents in a Transit Police Department","authors":"Natalie Schell-Busey, Carla Lewandowski, Kimberly Houser, Evan Sorg","doi":"10.1080/08974454.2023.2271464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe literature is unclear about whether male officers engage in more use of force incidents than female officers. One limitation of the research is that studies tend to focus on local police and have ignored other law enforcement. To address this, we explore potential gender differences among transit police officers using use of force data from 2009 to 2016. The results revealed a similar level of force used by male and female officers, but there appear to be some noteworthy differences by weapon type. While they were equally likely to use tasers, male officers were more likely to use batons and hand control and female officers were more likely to use firearms and OC spray. Additionally, we found some interesting differences in the predictors for taser use as compared to other weapons, particularly OC spray. Policy implications and directions for future research are discussed.Keywords: Gender use of forcetransit policetasers DISCLOSURE STATEMENTNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We used the same scale as Ready and White (Citation2011) to determine size of the police department, which was: small (<75 officers), medium (75–299 officers) and large (300+ officers).2 Since our data is limited to use of force incidents, officer presence and verbal direction are eliminated from our force factor values.3 Officer age and time on the force were highly and significantly correlated so we chose to use days on the force as a measure of experience seemed more important than the officer’s age.4 This limitation is true of most research examining gender differences given the lower representation of women in police agencies. However, the SEPTAPD sample had a lower percentage of female officer use of force incidents compared to other research.Additional informationFundingThe data collection for this study was supported by Rowan University seed funding.","PeriodicalId":51745,"journal":{"name":"Women & Criminal Justice","volume":"31 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2023.2271464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThe literature is unclear about whether male officers engage in more use of force incidents than female officers. One limitation of the research is that studies tend to focus on local police and have ignored other law enforcement. To address this, we explore potential gender differences among transit police officers using use of force data from 2009 to 2016. The results revealed a similar level of force used by male and female officers, but there appear to be some noteworthy differences by weapon type. While they were equally likely to use tasers, male officers were more likely to use batons and hand control and female officers were more likely to use firearms and OC spray. Additionally, we found some interesting differences in the predictors for taser use as compared to other weapons, particularly OC spray. Policy implications and directions for future research are discussed.Keywords: Gender use of forcetransit policetasers DISCLOSURE STATEMENTNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We used the same scale as Ready and White (Citation2011) to determine size of the police department, which was: small (<75 officers), medium (75–299 officers) and large (300+ officers).2 Since our data is limited to use of force incidents, officer presence and verbal direction are eliminated from our force factor values.3 Officer age and time on the force were highly and significantly correlated so we chose to use days on the force as a measure of experience seemed more important than the officer’s age.4 This limitation is true of most research examining gender differences given the lower representation of women in police agencies. However, the SEPTAPD sample had a lower percentage of female officer use of force incidents compared to other research.Additional informationFundingThe data collection for this study was supported by Rowan University seed funding.
交通警察部门警员性别与使用武力事件的探讨
摘要关于男性警官是否比女性警官更多地使用武力事件,文献尚不清楚。这项研究的一个局限是,研究往往集中在当地警察身上,而忽略了其他执法部门。为了解决这个问题,我们利用2009年至2016年的武力使用数据探讨了交通警察之间潜在的性别差异。结果显示,男性和女性警官使用的武力水平相似,但武器类型似乎存在一些值得注意的差异。虽然他们同样可能使用泰瑟枪,但男性警官更可能使用警棍和手控,而女性警官更可能使用枪支和OC喷雾。此外,我们发现与其他武器相比,泰瑟枪使用的预测因素存在一些有趣的差异,尤其是OC喷雾。最后讨论了未来研究的政策意义和方向。关键词:性别使用武力过境政策披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1:我们使用了与Ready and White (Citation2011)相同的量表来确定警察部门的规模,即小型(<75名警官),中型(75 - 299名警官)和大型(300多名警官)由于我们的数据仅限于使用武力的事件,因此从我们的武力因素值中排除了警官在场和口头指示警官的年龄和在职时间高度且显著相关,因此我们选择使用在职天数作为经验的衡量标准,因为这似乎比警官的年龄更重要鉴于妇女在警察机构中的代表性较低,大多数审查性别差异的研究都存在这种局限性。然而,与其他研究相比,SEPTAPD样本中女性警察使用武力事件的比例较低。本研究的数据收集由罗文大学种子基金支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Women & Criminal Justice is the only periodical devoted specifically to scholarly interdisciplinary and international research on all concerns related to women and criminal justice. It provides scholars with a single forum devoted to this critical specialty area in the fields of criminal justice, human rights, law, politics, sociology, social work, and women"s studies. Both qualitative and quantitative studies are welcomed, as are studies that test theories about women as victims, professionals and offenders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信