Bin Li, Michael Wiedenbeck, Frédéric Couffignal, Antonio M. Álvarez-Valero, Hui-Ming Bao, Chang-Fu Fan, Juan Han, Gui-Shan Jin, Yong-Bo Peng, Marcin Daniel Syczewski, Kimberly T. Tait, Franziska D.H. Wilke, Ulrich G. Wortmann
{"title":"Barite, Anhydrite and Gypsum Reference Materials for In Situ Oxygen and Sulfur Isotope Ratio Measurements","authors":"Bin Li, Michael Wiedenbeck, Frédéric Couffignal, Antonio M. Álvarez-Valero, Hui-Ming Bao, Chang-Fu Fan, Juan Han, Gui-Shan Jin, Yong-Bo Peng, Marcin Daniel Syczewski, Kimberly T. Tait, Franziska D.H. Wilke, Ulrich G. Wortmann","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Secondary ion mass spectrometry was used to test the δ<sup>18</sup>O and δ<sup>34</sup>S nanogram-scale homogeneity of a suite of candidate sulfate minerals, ultimately selecting three barite, two anhydrite, and two gypsum samples from the Royal Ontario Museum that have repeatabilities for their SIMS measurements of better than ±0.39‰ and ±0.37‰ (1<i>s</i>) for oxygen and sulfur isotope ratios, respectively. Metrological splits of each of the seven materials were sent to multiple gas source isotope ratio mass spectrometry laboratories in order to establish their absolute <sup>18</sup>O/<sup>16</sup>O and <sup>34</sup>S/<sup>32</sup>S ratios. The inter-laboratory results of GS-IRMS analyses yielded reasonably narrow ranges in δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>VSMOW</sub>, whereas larger variations in δ<sup>34</sup>S<sub>VCDT</sub> values were found between the results from the gas source laboratories. All samples have good reproducibility within laboratories of GS-IRMS 10<sup>3</sup>δ<sup>18</sup>O values of between ±0.24‰ and ±0.44‰ (1<i>s</i>). The reproducibility within laboratories of GS-IRMS 10<sup>3</sup>δ<sup>34</sup>S values range from ±0.07‰ to ±0.99‰ (1<i>s</i>). Here we also discuss some of the current analytical limitations affecting these isotope-mineral systems. A total of 256 metrological splits have been prepared from each of these seven materials; these aliquots will be made available to the global geochemical community.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"179-205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Secondary ion mass spectrometry was used to test the δ18O and δ34S nanogram-scale homogeneity of a suite of candidate sulfate minerals, ultimately selecting three barite, two anhydrite, and two gypsum samples from the Royal Ontario Museum that have repeatabilities for their SIMS measurements of better than ±0.39‰ and ±0.37‰ (1s) for oxygen and sulfur isotope ratios, respectively. Metrological splits of each of the seven materials were sent to multiple gas source isotope ratio mass spectrometry laboratories in order to establish their absolute 18O/16O and 34S/32S ratios. The inter-laboratory results of GS-IRMS analyses yielded reasonably narrow ranges in δ18OVSMOW, whereas larger variations in δ34SVCDT values were found between the results from the gas source laboratories. All samples have good reproducibility within laboratories of GS-IRMS 103δ18O values of between ±0.24‰ and ±0.44‰ (1s). The reproducibility within laboratories of GS-IRMS 103δ34S values range from ±0.07‰ to ±0.99‰ (1s). Here we also discuss some of the current analytical limitations affecting these isotope-mineral systems. A total of 256 metrological splits have been prepared from each of these seven materials; these aliquots will be made available to the global geochemical community.
期刊介绍:
Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.