Ribavirin Plus Therapy in Covid-19-A Single-Center Experience

Budha Oinam Singh, Gaurav Chikara, Prasan Kumar Panda, Yogesh Arvind Bahurupi, Sarama Saha, Venkatesh Srinivasa Pai
{"title":"Ribavirin Plus Therapy in Covid-19-A Single-Center Experience","authors":"Budha Oinam Singh, Gaurav Chikara, Prasan Kumar Panda, Yogesh Arvind Bahurupi, Sarama Saha, Venkatesh Srinivasa Pai","doi":"10.3844/ajptsp.2023.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": COVID-19 infection has a similar clinical spectrum of disease presentation such as SARS and MERS in the past. These led to the assumption of the possibility to treat COVID-19 infection with antivirals which had been used to treat SARS and MERS. A retrospective analysis was done in symptomatic adult patients of COVID-19 infection to explore whether ribavirin antiviral combinations reduce the need for both Noninvasive and Invasive Ventilation (NIV/IV) in the treatment of COVID-19 infections. Cohort A consisted of 40 patients who received the standard therapy and Cohort B of 61 patients who received the ribavirin plus therapy (Ribavirin with Hydroxychloroquine or Lopinavir/Ritonavir). Cohort A required NIV and IV each in 12.5% of patients while Cohort B required the same in 18.03 and 16.39% of patients respectively (p = 0.456). There was a similar trend of reduction of organ dysfunctions with time in cohort A compared to B. The study concluded there was no statistically significant reduction in the need for ventilation (non-invasive/invasive) and the development of multi-organ dysfunction in COVID-19 patients treated with ribavirin plus therapy, rather clinically standard therapy was better in all aspects.","PeriodicalId":7769,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/ajptsp.2023.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: COVID-19 infection has a similar clinical spectrum of disease presentation such as SARS and MERS in the past. These led to the assumption of the possibility to treat COVID-19 infection with antivirals which had been used to treat SARS and MERS. A retrospective analysis was done in symptomatic adult patients of COVID-19 infection to explore whether ribavirin antiviral combinations reduce the need for both Noninvasive and Invasive Ventilation (NIV/IV) in the treatment of COVID-19 infections. Cohort A consisted of 40 patients who received the standard therapy and Cohort B of 61 patients who received the ribavirin plus therapy (Ribavirin with Hydroxychloroquine or Lopinavir/Ritonavir). Cohort A required NIV and IV each in 12.5% of patients while Cohort B required the same in 18.03 and 16.39% of patients respectively (p = 0.456). There was a similar trend of reduction of organ dysfunctions with time in cohort A compared to B. The study concluded there was no statistically significant reduction in the need for ventilation (non-invasive/invasive) and the development of multi-organ dysfunction in COVID-19 patients treated with ribavirin plus therapy, rather clinically standard therapy was better in all aspects.
利巴韦林联合治疗新冠肺炎的单中心体验
COVID-19感染的临床表现与过去的SARS和MERS相似。这导致人们假设有可能使用用于治疗SARS和MERS的抗病毒药物来治疗COVID-19感染。回顾性分析有症状的成人COVID-19感染患者,探讨联合利巴韦林抗病毒药物治疗是否能减少无创和有创通气(NIV/IV)治疗COVID-19感染的必要性。A组包括40名接受标准治疗的患者,B组包括61名接受利巴韦林加治疗(利巴韦林加羟氯喹或洛匹那韦/利托那韦)的患者。A组需用NIV和IV的患者分别占12.5%,B组需用NIV和IV的患者分别占18.03和16.39% (p = 0.456)。与b组相比,a组器官功能障碍随时间减少的趋势与b组相似。研究认为,利巴韦林联合治疗的COVID-19患者通气需求(无创/有创)和多器官功能障碍的发生没有统计学意义,而是临床标准治疗在各方面都更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信