Drug use Pattern with Standard Indicators in Chattogram Medical College Hospital in Bangladesh

Iva Moni, Atashi Saha, Marzina Ajrin
{"title":"Drug use Pattern with Standard Indicators in Chattogram Medical College Hospital in Bangladesh","authors":"Iva Moni, Atashi Saha, Marzina Ajrin","doi":"10.52711/2231-5691.2023.00029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Irrational prescription being a global problem leading to ineffective, unsafe treatment. This study was conducted between November 10, 2019 to January 20, 2020 to assess drug use pattern using WHO/INRUD core prescribing indicators at Chattogram Medical College Hospital (CMCH). Total 500 patients were selected randomly. The results showed average number of drugs per encounter is 4.41 (optimal range = 1.6–1.8), generic drug prescription was 1.54% (optimal value = 100%), encounters with an antibiotic prescribed were 32.6% (optimal range =20.0–26.8%), encounters with an injection prescribed were 24.8% (optimal range =13.4–24.1%), drugs prescribed from EDL were 50.43% (optimal value = 100%) and drugs prescribed from the WHO EDL were 56.96% (optimal value = 100%). Average consultation time was 3.1 min (optimal value ≥10 min), average dispensing time was 35 s (optimal value ≥90 s) and the patients’ knowledge of correct dosage was 62.1% (optimal value =100%. The hospital had no copy of EDL and key drugs available in the stock were 82% (optimal value =100%). The concept of generic prescribing was negligible. There was reduced prescription of drugs from the National List of Essential Medicines, the prescription of antibiotics and injections was slightly higher than normal. Shorter consultation and dispensing time may lead to inadequate information about the medication being given to patients and patients had little chance to obtain information about their treatment. This study necessitates we are in need of strict scrutiny on the prescribing method of our country. So, we can achieve the goal of rational use of drug.","PeriodicalId":8537,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52711/2231-5691.2023.00029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irrational prescription being a global problem leading to ineffective, unsafe treatment. This study was conducted between November 10, 2019 to January 20, 2020 to assess drug use pattern using WHO/INRUD core prescribing indicators at Chattogram Medical College Hospital (CMCH). Total 500 patients were selected randomly. The results showed average number of drugs per encounter is 4.41 (optimal range = 1.6–1.8), generic drug prescription was 1.54% (optimal value = 100%), encounters with an antibiotic prescribed were 32.6% (optimal range =20.0–26.8%), encounters with an injection prescribed were 24.8% (optimal range =13.4–24.1%), drugs prescribed from EDL were 50.43% (optimal value = 100%) and drugs prescribed from the WHO EDL were 56.96% (optimal value = 100%). Average consultation time was 3.1 min (optimal value ≥10 min), average dispensing time was 35 s (optimal value ≥90 s) and the patients’ knowledge of correct dosage was 62.1% (optimal value =100%. The hospital had no copy of EDL and key drugs available in the stock were 82% (optimal value =100%). The concept of generic prescribing was negligible. There was reduced prescription of drugs from the National List of Essential Medicines, the prescription of antibiotics and injections was slightly higher than normal. Shorter consultation and dispensing time may lead to inadequate information about the medication being given to patients and patients had little chance to obtain information about their treatment. This study necessitates we are in need of strict scrutiny on the prescribing method of our country. So, we can achieve the goal of rational use of drug.
孟加拉Chattogram医学院医院标准指标用药模式
不合理的处方是一个全球性问题,导致无效和不安全的治疗。本研究于2019年11月10日至2020年1月20日在Chattogram医学院医院(CMCH)使用WHO/INRUD核心处方指标评估药物使用模式。随机抽取500例患者。结果表明:每次就诊平均药品数量为4.41种(最优范围为1.6 ~ 1.8种),仿制药处方占1.54%(最优值为100%),抗生素处方占32.6%(最优范围为20.0 ~ 26.8%),注射剂处方占24.8%(最优范围为13.4 ~ 24.1%),EDL处方占50.43%(最优值为100%),WHO EDL处方占56.96%(最优值为100%)。平均会诊时间3.1 min(最优值≥10 min),平均调剂时间35 s(最优值≥90 s),患者对正确剂量的知晓率为62.1%(最优值=100%)。医院无EDL副本,库存中关键药品可用率为82%(最优值为100%)。通用处方的概念是微不足道的。国家基本药物目录药品处方减少,抗生素和注射剂处方略高于正常水平。较短的咨询和配药时间可能导致给患者的药物信息不足,患者几乎没有机会获得有关其治疗的信息。这项研究表明,我们有必要对我国的处方方法进行严格的审查。从而达到合理用药的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信