{"title":"Reference evapotranspiration prediction using machine learning models: An empirical study from minimal climate data","authors":"Shaloo, Bipin Kumar, Himani Bisht, Jitendra Rajput, Anil Kumar Mishra, Kiran Kumara TM, Pothula Srinivasa Brahmanand","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The scarcity of climatic data is the biggest challenge for developing countries, and the development of models for reference evapotranspiration (ET<sub>0</sub>) estimation with limited datasets is crucial. Therefore, the current investigation assessed the efficacy of four machine learning (ML) models, namely, linear regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and neural networks (NN), to predict ET<sub>0</sub> based on minimal climate data in comparison with the standard FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (PM) method. The data on daily climate parameters were collected for the period 2000−2021, including maximum and minimum temperatures (<i>T</i><sub>max</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>), mean relative humidity (<i>R</i><sub>H</sub>), wind speed (<i>W</i><sub>S</sub>), and sunshine hours (<i>S</i><sub>SH</sub>). The performance of the developed models considering different input combinations was evaluated by using several statistical performance measures. The results showed that the SVM model performed better than the other ML models during training (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.985; mean absolute error [MAE] = 0.170 mm/day; mean square error [MSE] = 0.052 mm/day; root mean square error [RMSE] = 0.229 mm/day; mean absolute percentage error [MAPE] = 5.72%) and testing stages (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.985; MAE = 0.168 mm/day; MSE = 0.050 mm/day; RMSE = 0.224 mm/day; MAPE = 5.91%) under full dataset scenario. The best performance of the models to estimate was with <i>T</i><sub>max</sub>, <i>R</i><sub>H</sub>, <i>W</i><sub>s</sub>, <i>S</i><sub>SH</sub>, and <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>. The results of the current study are substantial as it offers an approach to estimate ET<sub>0</sub> in semi-arid data-scarce region.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 3","pages":"956-972"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21504","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The scarcity of climatic data is the biggest challenge for developing countries, and the development of models for reference evapotranspiration (ET0) estimation with limited datasets is crucial. Therefore, the current investigation assessed the efficacy of four machine learning (ML) models, namely, linear regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and neural networks (NN), to predict ET0 based on minimal climate data in comparison with the standard FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (PM) method. The data on daily climate parameters were collected for the period 2000−2021, including maximum and minimum temperatures (Tmax and Tmin), mean relative humidity (RH), wind speed (WS), and sunshine hours (SSH). The performance of the developed models considering different input combinations was evaluated by using several statistical performance measures. The results showed that the SVM model performed better than the other ML models during training (R2 = 0.985; mean absolute error [MAE] = 0.170 mm/day; mean square error [MSE] = 0.052 mm/day; root mean square error [RMSE] = 0.229 mm/day; mean absolute percentage error [MAPE] = 5.72%) and testing stages (R2 = 0.985; MAE = 0.168 mm/day; MSE = 0.050 mm/day; RMSE = 0.224 mm/day; MAPE = 5.91%) under full dataset scenario. The best performance of the models to estimate was with Tmax, RH, Ws, SSH, and Tmin. The results of the current study are substantial as it offers an approach to estimate ET0 in semi-arid data-scarce region.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.