Civilizational and culturological aspect of philosophical and legal studies of observance of human rights

Nataliia Gaivoroniuk, Hanna Siromska, Viacheslav Serhieiev, Viktoriia Zahurska-Antoniuk, Andrii Kobetiak, Violeta Tohobytska
{"title":"Civilizational and culturological aspect of philosophical and legal studies of observance of human rights","authors":"Nataliia Gaivoroniuk, Hanna Siromska, Viacheslav Serhieiev, Viktoriia Zahurska-Antoniuk, Andrii Kobetiak, Violeta Tohobytska","doi":"10.46398/cuestpol.4178.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of the article was to study the key elements of the civilizational and cultural aspect of philosophical and legal research on the observance of human rights. The subject of the research was specifically the philosophy of human rights observance. Methodologically it is descriptive research developed in the domains of legal philosophy and logic. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that in modern legal discourse several approaches to the modern cross-cultural substantiation of the idea of human rights have been identified. Among them deserve attention the theories of human rights, based on the self-limitation of negative manifestations of a person, the ontology of spheres of human existence, the idea of human identity and the possibility of intercultural legal discourse. All allowed to conclude that, the further development of a theory of human rights acceptable to the majority of countries, in the opinion of the authors, is connected precisely with the otological concepts of human rights, among which the intercultural legal approach can be of great importance, in heuristic and hermeneutic terms.","PeriodicalId":414722,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones Políticas","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones Políticas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4178.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main purpose of the article was to study the key elements of the civilizational and cultural aspect of philosophical and legal research on the observance of human rights. The subject of the research was specifically the philosophy of human rights observance. Methodologically it is descriptive research developed in the domains of legal philosophy and logic. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that in modern legal discourse several approaches to the modern cross-cultural substantiation of the idea of human rights have been identified. Among them deserve attention the theories of human rights, based on the self-limitation of negative manifestations of a person, the ontology of spheres of human existence, the idea of human identity and the possibility of intercultural legal discourse. All allowed to conclude that, the further development of a theory of human rights acceptable to the majority of countries, in the opinion of the authors, is connected precisely with the otological concepts of human rights, among which the intercultural legal approach can be of great importance, in heuristic and hermeneutic terms.
尊重人权的哲学和法律研究的文明和文化方面
这篇文章的主要目的是研究关于遵守人权的哲学和法律研究的文明和文化方面的关键因素。这项研究的具体主题是遵守人权的哲学。在方法论上,它是在法哲学和逻辑领域发展起来的描述性研究。科学的新颖性在于,在现代法律话语中,人权观念的现代跨文化实体化已经确定了几种途径。其中值得注意的是,以人的消极表现的自我限制为基础的人权理论、人类生存领域的本体论、人类身份的观念和跨文化法律话语的可能性。所有人都可以得出这样的结论:作者认为,为大多数国家所接受的人权理论的进一步发展与人权的耳学概念密切相关,其中,从启发式和解释学的角度来看,跨文化的法律方法可能非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信