Expropriation and other forms of reparation in terms of compensation for damage caused as a result of war crimes: International legal experience

Liydmyla Panova, Ernest Gramatskyy, Dmytro Baranenko, Dmytro Sichko, Oleksiy Ulianov
{"title":"Expropriation and other forms of reparation in terms of compensation for damage caused as a result of war crimes: International legal experience","authors":"Liydmyla Panova, Ernest Gramatskyy, Dmytro Baranenko, Dmytro Sichko, Oleksiy Ulianov","doi":"10.46398/cuestpol.4178.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of international armed conflicts, questions always arise about the payment of post-war reparations. Although the process of reparation for damages caused as a result of war crimes, in most cases, begins only after the end of such a conflict, its duration and effectiveness depend on the preliminary analysis and choice of an existing reparation or development of a new model. The purpose of the work was the analysis of existing mechanisms for the payment of post-war reparations, and the search for the most effective models of compensation for Ukraine by Russia for the damage caused as a result of military aggression and the commission of international crimes. The dialectical, systemic-structural, historical, comparative, logical-formal, comparative-legal and systemic-functional methods were used. In the results, the legal nature and historical mechanisms of reparation of damage are explained, as well as problematic issues of this institution of the law of international liability are outlined. In the conclusions, different mechanisms of reparation that can be used by the State and those available to individuals, victims of violations of international crimes committed on their territory and mixed models are considered.","PeriodicalId":414722,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones Políticas","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones Políticas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4178.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a result of international armed conflicts, questions always arise about the payment of post-war reparations. Although the process of reparation for damages caused as a result of war crimes, in most cases, begins only after the end of such a conflict, its duration and effectiveness depend on the preliminary analysis and choice of an existing reparation or development of a new model. The purpose of the work was the analysis of existing mechanisms for the payment of post-war reparations, and the search for the most effective models of compensation for Ukraine by Russia for the damage caused as a result of military aggression and the commission of international crimes. The dialectical, systemic-structural, historical, comparative, logical-formal, comparative-legal and systemic-functional methods were used. In the results, the legal nature and historical mechanisms of reparation of damage are explained, as well as problematic issues of this institution of the law of international liability are outlined. In the conclusions, different mechanisms of reparation that can be used by the State and those available to individuals, victims of violations of international crimes committed on their territory and mixed models are considered.
征用和其他形式的赔偿以赔偿战争罪行所造成的损害:国际法律经验
由于国际武装冲突,总是出现支付战后赔款的问题。虽然对战争罪行造成的损害进行赔偿的过程,在大多数情况下,只是在这种冲突结束之后才开始,但其持续时间和效力取决于对现有赔偿的初步分析和选择或发展一种新模式。这项工作的目的是分析支付战后赔款的现有机制,并寻求俄罗斯赔偿乌克兰因军事侵略和犯下国际罪行所造成的损害的最有效模式。运用了辩证方法、系统结构方法、历史方法、比较方法、逻辑形式方法、比较法律方法和系统功能方法。在结果中,解释了损害赔偿的法律性质和历史机制,并概述了这一国际责任法制度的问题。在结论中,审议了国家可以使用的不同赔偿机制和个人、在其领土上犯下的违反国际罪行的受害者可以使用的机制以及混合模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信