{"title":"Analysis of survivorship following periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia based on three-dimensional acetabular coverage","authors":"Tetsuya Tachibana, Hideyuki Koga, Hiroki Katagiri, Takahisa Ogawa, Ryohei Takada, Kazumasa Miyatake, Tetsuya Jinno","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnad044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established procedure for correcting acetabular coverage and preventing osteoarthritis progression in hip dysplasia. However, it is unclear how acetabular coverage changes three-dimensionally after PAO and how it affects survival. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the change in three-dimensional acetabular coverage preoperatively and postoperatively and identify demographic, clinical and radiographic factors associated with conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and radiographic osteoarthritis progression after PAO. We retrospectively reviewed 46 consecutive patients (66 hips) who underwent PAO, using preoperative and postoperative radiographs and pelvic computed tomography (CT). Three-dimensional acetabular coverage based on CT data was investigated. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed, and hazard ratios were calculated using univariate Cox regression models to identify the risk factors associated with conversion to THA and radiographic osteoarthritis progression after PAO as the endpoints. Radiographic osteoarthritis progression was defined as a minimum joint space of <2.0 mm. The mean follow-up was 10.7 years. Post-PAO, acetabular coverage gradually increased from the anterosuperior to the superior to the posterosuperior direction. The survival rate after PAO was 98.0% at 10 years. Less postoperative superior acetabular coverage, with a hazard ratio of 0.93, was significantly associated with conversion to THA and radiographic osteoarthritis progression after PAO (P = 0.03). In this study, poor superior acetabular coverage after PAO was a significant risk factor for conversion to THA and radiographic progression of osteoarthritis. Therefore, surgeons should attempt to prioritize the correction of the superior acetabular coverage when performing PAO.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"5 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnad044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established procedure for correcting acetabular coverage and preventing osteoarthritis progression in hip dysplasia. However, it is unclear how acetabular coverage changes three-dimensionally after PAO and how it affects survival. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the change in three-dimensional acetabular coverage preoperatively and postoperatively and identify demographic, clinical and radiographic factors associated with conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and radiographic osteoarthritis progression after PAO. We retrospectively reviewed 46 consecutive patients (66 hips) who underwent PAO, using preoperative and postoperative radiographs and pelvic computed tomography (CT). Three-dimensional acetabular coverage based on CT data was investigated. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed, and hazard ratios were calculated using univariate Cox regression models to identify the risk factors associated with conversion to THA and radiographic osteoarthritis progression after PAO as the endpoints. Radiographic osteoarthritis progression was defined as a minimum joint space of <2.0 mm. The mean follow-up was 10.7 years. Post-PAO, acetabular coverage gradually increased from the anterosuperior to the superior to the posterosuperior direction. The survival rate after PAO was 98.0% at 10 years. Less postoperative superior acetabular coverage, with a hazard ratio of 0.93, was significantly associated with conversion to THA and radiographic osteoarthritis progression after PAO (P = 0.03). In this study, poor superior acetabular coverage after PAO was a significant risk factor for conversion to THA and radiographic progression of osteoarthritis. Therefore, surgeons should attempt to prioritize the correction of the superior acetabular coverage when performing PAO.