Exploration and Struggle in Advancing Historical Research Methodologies

Young Kyo Oh
{"title":"Exploration and Struggle in Advancing Historical Research Methodologies","authors":"Young Kyo Oh","doi":"10.16912/tkhr.2023.09.259.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the purview of “Retrospection and Prospect,” analyses of research findings from 2021 to 2022 reveal several notable trends. Firstly, scholars in various domains emphasize the intensification of collaborative research, reevaluation of hypothetical and traditional research paradigms, and the promotion of structural history. Simultaneously, there is a discernible trend towards individualized research pursuits. Secondly, the quantitative growth in research output has led to the diversification of research methodologies. However, it is worth reiterating that the mere increase in quantity has not invariably resulted in an enhancement of research quality. An enduring concern is the challenge faced by emerging researchers in establishing and expanding their unique research domains, exacerbated by limitations in accessing new source materials and research topics. To address this predicament, there is a pressing call to explore novel research avenues, revisit foundational scholarship, and develop innovative methodological approaches. Thirdly, the papers highlight the aspiration for collaborative and collective research endeavors that envisage a ‘chemical synergy,’ fostering the emergence of diverse research domains with the aim of forging a novel historical paradigm in the 21st century.BR Despite the ongoing earnest endeavors of Korean historians, the hope remains for historical research communities in Korea that prioritizes empirical and profound analyses over mechanistic, superficial, and fragmented pursuits.","PeriodicalId":215841,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Historical Review","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16912/tkhr.2023.09.259.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the purview of “Retrospection and Prospect,” analyses of research findings from 2021 to 2022 reveal several notable trends. Firstly, scholars in various domains emphasize the intensification of collaborative research, reevaluation of hypothetical and traditional research paradigms, and the promotion of structural history. Simultaneously, there is a discernible trend towards individualized research pursuits. Secondly, the quantitative growth in research output has led to the diversification of research methodologies. However, it is worth reiterating that the mere increase in quantity has not invariably resulted in an enhancement of research quality. An enduring concern is the challenge faced by emerging researchers in establishing and expanding their unique research domains, exacerbated by limitations in accessing new source materials and research topics. To address this predicament, there is a pressing call to explore novel research avenues, revisit foundational scholarship, and develop innovative methodological approaches. Thirdly, the papers highlight the aspiration for collaborative and collective research endeavors that envisage a ‘chemical synergy,’ fostering the emergence of diverse research domains with the aim of forging a novel historical paradigm in the 21st century.BR Despite the ongoing earnest endeavors of Korean historians, the hope remains for historical research communities in Korea that prioritizes empirical and profound analyses over mechanistic, superficial, and fragmented pursuits.
推进历史研究方法的探索与奋斗
在“回顾与展望”的范围内,对2021年至2022年的研究结果进行了分析,揭示了几个值得注意的趋势。首先,各领域学者强调加强合作研究,重新评估假设和传统的研究范式,促进结构史。同时,个性化的研究追求也有明显的趋势。其次,研究产出的数量增长导致了研究方法的多样化。然而,值得重申的是,仅仅是数量的增加并不一定导致研究质量的提高。新兴研究人员在建立和扩展他们独特的研究领域时所面临的挑战是一个持久的问题,而获取新的原始材料和研究主题的限制加剧了这一挑战。为了解决这一困境,迫切需要探索新的研究途径,重新审视基础学术,并开发创新的方法方法。第三,论文强调了合作和集体研究努力的愿望,设想了“化学协同作用”,促进了不同研究领域的出现,目的是在21世纪建立一个新的历史范式。BR尽管韩国历史学家一直在认真努力,但韩国的历史研究团体仍然希望优先考虑经验和深刻的分析,而不是机械的,肤浅的和碎片化的追求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信