Balance and Expansion: The Journey to a New Takeoff

Jeonguk Kim
{"title":"Balance and Expansion: The Journey to a New Takeoff","authors":"Jeonguk Kim","doi":"10.16912/tkhr.2023.09.259.447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Examining the trend in research over the past two years, political history still remains a main field, while cultural history has taken a new center position due to stable growth in the number of articles related to popular culture, immigration, race, and women. However, diplomatic history, military history, economic history, intellectual history, and labor history have been productive.BR In spite of the stagnation of research in some fields, it is positive is that the researches focusing on the period from the founding period of the nation to the mid-19th century are increasing, and thus, the era of research subjects is becoming more diversified and balanced. It is also important to note that new fields like medical history and environmental history have been established. As the traditional research fields also are embracing these new themes, the boundaries separating the fields have become unstable.BR This expansion is taking place not only in terms of subject matter but also in terms of methodology. Methodologies used to explore cultural history are now shared in various fields providing researchers with new perspectives. In addition, intersectionality, a theory on the understanding of interacting multiple social and cultural structures is spreading into diverse fields.BR However, the American historical community, which has continued to develop by accumulating various kinds of researches, is still facing challenges. Overcoming these challenges will help the American historical community advance into a new era.","PeriodicalId":215841,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Historical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16912/tkhr.2023.09.259.447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examining the trend in research over the past two years, political history still remains a main field, while cultural history has taken a new center position due to stable growth in the number of articles related to popular culture, immigration, race, and women. However, diplomatic history, military history, economic history, intellectual history, and labor history have been productive.BR In spite of the stagnation of research in some fields, it is positive is that the researches focusing on the period from the founding period of the nation to the mid-19th century are increasing, and thus, the era of research subjects is becoming more diversified and balanced. It is also important to note that new fields like medical history and environmental history have been established. As the traditional research fields also are embracing these new themes, the boundaries separating the fields have become unstable.BR This expansion is taking place not only in terms of subject matter but also in terms of methodology. Methodologies used to explore cultural history are now shared in various fields providing researchers with new perspectives. In addition, intersectionality, a theory on the understanding of interacting multiple social and cultural structures is spreading into diverse fields.BR However, the American historical community, which has continued to develop by accumulating various kinds of researches, is still facing challenges. Overcoming these challenges will help the American historical community advance into a new era.
平衡与扩张:新的起飞之旅
从过去两年的研究趋势来看,政治史仍然是一个主要领域,而文化史由于与大众文化、移民、种族和妇女有关的文章数量的稳定增长而占据了新的中心位置。然而,外交史、军事史、经济史、思想史和劳动史都是富有成果的。BR尽管某些领域的研究停滞不前,但积极的一面是,以建国时期至19世纪中期为研究对象的研究越来越多,从而使研究对象的时代变得更加多样化和均衡。同样值得注意的是,医疗史和环境史等新领域已经建立起来。随着传统的研究领域也在不断地拥抱这些新的主题,这些领域之间的界限已经变得不稳定。BR这种扩展不仅发生在主题方面,而且发生在方法方面。用于探索文化史的方法现在在各个领域共享,为研究人员提供了新的视角。此外,交叉性这一理解多种社会文化结构相互作用的理论正在向各个领域扩展。BR然而,通过积累各种研究而不断发展的美国史学界仍然面临着挑战。克服这些挑战将有助于美国历史学界进入一个新时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信