Optimising academic writing assessment during Covid-19: The development multiple choice tests to develop writing without writing

Q3 Social Sciences
{"title":"Optimising academic writing assessment during Covid-19: The development multiple choice tests to develop writing without writing","authors":"","doi":"10.38140/pie.v41i3.6804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Restrictions and challenges brought on by the Covid-19 pandemic challenged higher education institutions to innovate to keep reaching teaching and learning goals. In South Africa, existing social inequalities were exacerbated by the pandemic restrictions and many students faced severe challenges in terms of access and support to aid in their academic success. Even under ‘normal’ circumstances, developing students’ academic writing skills and critical thinking ability can be challenging. It is this teaching and learning goal, along with the added contextual challenges brought on by the pandemic that prompted the intervention described in this paper. How can we teach and assess critical thinking, and higher-order aspects of academic writing, in such a resource scarce environment? In this paper, the development and results of formative, multiple choice question (MCQ)-style, online tests aimed at developing critical thinking and higher-order aspects of academic writing is discussed. The development of the test through intentional test item design and online test setup is explained whereafter statistical analysis of student participation and results are presented. These preliminary results show that students generally use learning opportunities to their advantage to learn and improve their marks. It also shows that flexible test structure and a supportive test environment can promote equality of outcomes for students, egardless of the contextual challenges they face.","PeriodicalId":19864,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Education","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v41i3.6804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restrictions and challenges brought on by the Covid-19 pandemic challenged higher education institutions to innovate to keep reaching teaching and learning goals. In South Africa, existing social inequalities were exacerbated by the pandemic restrictions and many students faced severe challenges in terms of access and support to aid in their academic success. Even under ‘normal’ circumstances, developing students’ academic writing skills and critical thinking ability can be challenging. It is this teaching and learning goal, along with the added contextual challenges brought on by the pandemic that prompted the intervention described in this paper. How can we teach and assess critical thinking, and higher-order aspects of academic writing, in such a resource scarce environment? In this paper, the development and results of formative, multiple choice question (MCQ)-style, online tests aimed at developing critical thinking and higher-order aspects of academic writing is discussed. The development of the test through intentional test item design and online test setup is explained whereafter statistical analysis of student participation and results are presented. These preliminary results show that students generally use learning opportunities to their advantage to learn and improve their marks. It also shows that flexible test structure and a supportive test environment can promote equality of outcomes for students, egardless of the contextual challenges they face.
优化Covid-19期间的学术写作评估:开发多项选择测试,以培养写作能力
新冠肺炎大流行带来的限制和挑战要求高等教育机构进行创新,以不断实现教学目标。在南非,现有的社会不平等因大流行病的限制而加剧,许多学生在获得帮助其学业成功的机会和支持方面面临严峻挑战。即使在“正常”的情况下,培养学生的学术写作技巧和批判性思维能力也是具有挑战性的。正是这一教学和学习目标,以及大流行带来的额外背景挑战,促使了本文所述的干预措施。在这样一个资源稀缺的环境中,我们如何教授和评估批判性思维,以及学术写作的更高层次?本文讨论了旨在培养批判性思维和学术写作高阶方面的形成性选择题(MCQ)风格在线测试的发展和结果。通过有意的测试项目设计和在线测试设置来解释测试的发展,并给出学生参与和结果的统计分析。这些初步结果表明,学生普遍利用学习机会来学习和提高成绩。研究还表明,灵活的考试结构和支持性的考试环境可以促进学生成绩的平等,无论他们面临何种背景挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Education
Perspectives in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Education is a professional, refereed journal, which encourages submission of previously unpublished articles on contemporary educational issues. As a journal that represents a variety of cross-disciplinary interests, both theoretical and practical, it seeks to stimulate debates on a wide range of topics. PIE invites manuscripts employing innovative qualitative and quantitative methods and approaches including (but not limited to) ethnographic observation and interviewing, grounded theory, life history, case study, curriculum analysis and critique, policy studies, ethnomethodology, social and educational critique, phenomenology, deconstruction, and genealogy. Debates on epistemology, methodology, or ethics, from a range of perspectives including postpositivism, interpretivism, constructivism, critical theory, feminism, post-modernism are also invited. PIE seeks to stimulate important dialogues and intellectual exchange on education and democratic transition with respect to schools, colleges, non-governmental organisations, universities and technikons in South Africa and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信