Validity and Reliability of the Perinatal Grief Intensity Scale in a Chinese Clinical Sample: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

IF 0.4 4区医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.31083/j.ceog5009189

Jianping Xu, Shuiqin Gu, Shuihong Su

{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Perinatal Grief Intensity Scale in a Chinese Clinical Sample: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Jianping Xu, Shuiqin Gu, Shuihong Su","doi":"10.31083/j.ceog5009189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study introduced the Perinatal Grief Intensity Scale (PGIS) and applied it to assess the reliability and validity of perinatal loss in Chinese mothers. Methods: To sinicize PGIS and cultural debugging of the scale, reliability validity was assessed in this prospective cross-sectional study. Results: The Chinese version of the PGIS contained 14 items in three dimensions: reality, confront others, and congruence. The content validity index (CVI) at the total scale level, mean scale level, and item level was 0.92, 0.909, and 0.860–1.000. Exploratory factors were identified as three metric factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 66.627%. The Chinese version of the Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS) was used as a calibration standard, and the correlation coefficient was 0.759. The total Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the Chinese version of the PGIS was 0.768, with a fold-half reliability of 0.749. The scale showed good reliability and validity. Conclusions: The Chinese version of the PGIS was used as a calibration standard by exploratory factor testing, and the correlation coefficient was good, and the scale had good reliability and validity for application in China.","PeriodicalId":10312,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5009189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study introduced the Perinatal Grief Intensity Scale (PGIS) and applied it to assess the reliability and validity of perinatal loss in Chinese mothers. Methods: To sinicize PGIS and cultural debugging of the scale, reliability validity was assessed in this prospective cross-sectional study. Results: The Chinese version of the PGIS contained 14 items in three dimensions: reality, confront others, and congruence. The content validity index (CVI) at the total scale level, mean scale level, and item level was 0.92, 0.909, and 0.860–1.000. Exploratory factors were identified as three metric factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 66.627%. The Chinese version of the Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS) was used as a calibration standard, and the correlation coefficient was 0.759. The total Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the Chinese version of the PGIS was 0.768, with a fold-half reliability of 0.749. The scale showed good reliability and validity. Conclusions: The Chinese version of the PGIS was used as a calibration standard by exploratory factor testing, and the correlation coefficient was good, and the scale had good reliability and validity for application in China.

查看原文本刊更多论文

围产期悲伤强度量表在中国临床样本中的效度和信度:一项前瞻性横断面研究

背景:本研究引入围产期悲伤强度量表(PGIS)，并应用该量表评估中国母亲围产期失落的信度和效度。方法:采用前瞻性横断面研究，对PGIS量表进行汉化和文化调试，评估信度效度。结果:PGIS中文版包含现实、面对他人和一致性三个维度的14个条目。总量表水平、平均量表水平和项目水平的内容效度指数(CVI)分别为0.92、0.909和0.860 ~ 1.000。探索性因子确定为3个度量因子，累积方差贡献率为66.627%。采用中文版围产期悲伤量表(PGS)作为校正标准，相关系数为0.759。中国版PGIS的总Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.768，信度为0.749。量表具有良好的信效度。结论:经探索性因子检验，采用中文版PGIS作为标准标准，相关系数较好，量表具有较好的信度和效度，适合国内应用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology 医学-妇产科学

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

241

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： CEOG is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. CEOG covers all aspects of Obstetrics and Gynecology, including obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine. All submissions of cutting-edge advances of medical research in the area of women''s health worldwide are encouraged.