Reshoring or Offshoring: How Global Production Is Changing in Global Value Chains

Y. Simachev, A. Fedyunina, M. Yurevich
{"title":"Reshoring or Offshoring: How Global Production Is Changing in Global Value Chains","authors":"Y. Simachev, A. Fedyunina, M. Yurevich","doi":"10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-10-71-81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, a debate on the relationship between reshoring, nearshoring, and offshore outsourcing of operational processes in multinational companies (MNCs) has emerged. However, the evidence provided is often fragmented and rarely considers more than one domestic economy of an MNC. The aim of this article is to discuss the prevalence of reshoring and offshoring in the global economy and the influence of government policies on these processes. Through the analysis of territorial mobility of subsidiaries of major MNCs using the ADIMA OECD database, it was revealed that MNCs restructure their foreign subsidiary networks differently. From the research results, we also see that European MNCs were more likely to be characterized by business compression (40%), while 48% of Asian MNCs saw global expansion and a further 13% were actively involved in offshoring operational phases of their operations. Particularly notable is the relocation of MNC subsidiaries to Europe, resulting from both reshoring initiatives by European companies and the expansion of subsidiary networks by Asian MNCs. We demonstrate that reshoring stimulation policies are only beginning to emerge; however, they likely have existed for some time, intertwined with policies aimed at stimulating and localizing domestic production. We discuss the challenges and opportunities that arise for developing (catching-up) countries in the context of growing territorial mobility of MNC subsidiaries and highlight the feasibility of shifting government policies towards managing the country’s integration into global value chains (GVCs), including the establishment of GVC elements within the national economy.","PeriodicalId":398103,"journal":{"name":"World Economy and International Relations","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Economy and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-10-71-81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, a debate on the relationship between reshoring, nearshoring, and offshore outsourcing of operational processes in multinational companies (MNCs) has emerged. However, the evidence provided is often fragmented and rarely considers more than one domestic economy of an MNC. The aim of this article is to discuss the prevalence of reshoring and offshoring in the global economy and the influence of government policies on these processes. Through the analysis of territorial mobility of subsidiaries of major MNCs using the ADIMA OECD database, it was revealed that MNCs restructure their foreign subsidiary networks differently. From the research results, we also see that European MNCs were more likely to be characterized by business compression (40%), while 48% of Asian MNCs saw global expansion and a further 13% were actively involved in offshoring operational phases of their operations. Particularly notable is the relocation of MNC subsidiaries to Europe, resulting from both reshoring initiatives by European companies and the expansion of subsidiary networks by Asian MNCs. We demonstrate that reshoring stimulation policies are only beginning to emerge; however, they likely have existed for some time, intertwined with policies aimed at stimulating and localizing domestic production. We discuss the challenges and opportunities that arise for developing (catching-up) countries in the context of growing territorial mobility of MNC subsidiaries and highlight the feasibility of shifting government policies towards managing the country’s integration into global value chains (GVCs), including the establishment of GVC elements within the national economy.
回流或离岸:全球生产如何在全球价值链中变化
近年来,关于跨国公司(MNCs)业务流程的回流、近岸和离岸外包之间关系的争论已经出现。然而,所提供的证据往往是支离破碎的,很少考虑跨国公司的一个以上的国内经济。本文的目的是讨论全球经济中回流和离岸外包的普遍性以及政府政策对这些过程的影响。通过使用ADIMA OECD数据库对主要跨国公司子公司的地域流动性进行分析,发现跨国公司对其海外子公司网络的重组方式不同。从研究结果中,我们还看到,欧洲跨国公司更有可能以业务压缩为特征(40%),而48%的亚洲跨国公司实现了全球扩张,另有13%的亚洲跨国公司积极参与其业务的离岸运营阶段。特别值得注意的是跨国公司子公司向欧洲的搬迁,这是由欧洲公司的回流举措和亚洲跨国公司扩大子公司网络造成的。我们证明,刺激回流的政策才刚刚开始出现;然而,它们可能已经存在了一段时间,与旨在刺激国内生产和使其本地化的政策交织在一起。我们讨论了在跨国公司子公司地域流动性日益增长的背景下,发展中(追赶)国家面临的挑战和机遇,并强调了将政府政策转向管理国家融入全球价值链(GVC)的可行性,包括在国民经济中建立全球价值链要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信