“Coercive Diplomacy” as an Instrument of EU Influence on the Peace Process: Transdniestrian Casus

N. Shevchuk
{"title":"“Coercive Diplomacy” as an Instrument of EU Influence on the Peace Process: Transdniestrian Casus","authors":"N. Shevchuk","doi":"10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-10-120-131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Coercive diplomacy” is often described as a protective and non-offensive political and diplomatic tool, an alternative to military action based on the threat of force instead of its use. The article shows how “coercive diplomacy” has evolved nowadays, when it is applied in the form of sanctions and special economic regimes both as an incentive to action and as a requirement to change policies. The emphasis is placed on the role of trade policy in the context of settlement of a protracted conflict. The experience of using trade and economic instruments by the European Union within the framework of the “carrot and stick” strategy is analyzed on the example of stimulating the reorientation of Transdniestrian producers from the Russian to the European market and then involving this unrecognized de facto state in the regime of the deep comprehensive free trade area (DCFTA) of the EU in order to influence the peace process and the reintegration of the Republic of Moldova. The author concludes that trade instruments allow the EU not only to keep the Transdniestrian elites in its zone of influence, but also to balance Russian presence in this region. The article has been prepared on the basis of an extensive number of sources, including statements of participants in the processes described in the article, as well as the recorded results of the author’s working meetings, for a number of years directly involved in the negotiation process on the Transdniestrian settlement in the “5+2” format and negotiations with the leadership of the EU Trade Department on the implementation of certain aspects of the DCFTA regime in Transdniestria.","PeriodicalId":398103,"journal":{"name":"World Economy and International Relations","volume":"10 45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Economy and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-10-120-131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Coercive diplomacy” is often described as a protective and non-offensive political and diplomatic tool, an alternative to military action based on the threat of force instead of its use. The article shows how “coercive diplomacy” has evolved nowadays, when it is applied in the form of sanctions and special economic regimes both as an incentive to action and as a requirement to change policies. The emphasis is placed on the role of trade policy in the context of settlement of a protracted conflict. The experience of using trade and economic instruments by the European Union within the framework of the “carrot and stick” strategy is analyzed on the example of stimulating the reorientation of Transdniestrian producers from the Russian to the European market and then involving this unrecognized de facto state in the regime of the deep comprehensive free trade area (DCFTA) of the EU in order to influence the peace process and the reintegration of the Republic of Moldova. The author concludes that trade instruments allow the EU not only to keep the Transdniestrian elites in its zone of influence, but also to balance Russian presence in this region. The article has been prepared on the basis of an extensive number of sources, including statements of participants in the processes described in the article, as well as the recorded results of the author’s working meetings, for a number of years directly involved in the negotiation process on the Transdniestrian settlement in the “5+2” format and negotiations with the leadership of the EU Trade Department on the implementation of certain aspects of the DCFTA regime in Transdniestria.
“强制外交”作为欧盟影响和平进程的一种手段:德涅斯特河沿岸原因
“强制外交”通常被描述为一种保护性和非进攻性的政治和外交工具,是基于武力威胁而不是使用武力的军事行动的替代办法。这篇文章显示了“强制外交”如今是如何演变的,它以制裁和特殊经济制度的形式实施,既作为行动的激励,又作为改变政策的要求。重点放在贸易政策在解决一场旷日持久的冲突方面的作用。本文分析了欧洲联盟在"胡萝卜加大棒"战略框架内利用贸易和经济手段的经验,例如刺激德涅斯特河外的生产者从俄罗斯转向欧洲市场,然后将这个未被承认的事实上的国家纳入欧盟深度全面自由贸易区(DCFTA)制度,以影响和平进程和摩尔多瓦共和国的重新融合。作者的结论是,贸易工具使欧盟不仅可以将德涅斯特河沿岸的精英留在其势力范围内,还可以平衡俄罗斯在该地区的存在。本文已经准备的基础上,广泛的来源,包括语句的参与者在本文中描述的过程,以及作者的工作会议的记录结果,许多年来直接参与谈判过程Transdniestrian和解的“5 + 2”格式和谈判与欧盟贸易部门的领导在实施DCFTA政权在德涅斯特河沿岸的某些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信