A TALE OF TWO LAWS: SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT AND ANTI CONVERSION LAW IN INDIA

Riona Basu
{"title":"A TALE OF TWO LAWS: SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT AND ANTI CONVERSION LAW IN INDIA","authors":"Riona Basu","doi":"10.46609/ijsser.2023.v08i09.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is exploratory in nature and utilizes qualitative methods to understand the implications of two laws. The Special Marriage Act (SMA) of 1954 allows for inter-religious marriage and is heralded as a ‘liberal law’ which does not identify people based on parochial identity but sees them as ‘individuals’. However, the administrative workings of SMA suggest otherwise: giving a month’s notice, and calling for three witnesses, makes it a nightmare for those navigating it in the context of inter-religious marriages in India. Combined with anti-conversion laws, which by now twelve states of India have already passed, the moral vigilantism by right-wingers in case of such marriages and over-enthusiastic marriage officers who go beyond the law to question and act on objections, make SMA unattractive. In the background of the queer marriage hearing ongoing in the Supreme Court, which is calling for the amendment of the SMA to allow same-sex marriages, begs the question, can two calls for changes-one progressive and the other regressive be accommodated by the Indian state?","PeriodicalId":500023,"journal":{"name":"International journal of social science and economic research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of social science and economic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46609/ijsser.2023.v08i09.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is exploratory in nature and utilizes qualitative methods to understand the implications of two laws. The Special Marriage Act (SMA) of 1954 allows for inter-religious marriage and is heralded as a ‘liberal law’ which does not identify people based on parochial identity but sees them as ‘individuals’. However, the administrative workings of SMA suggest otherwise: giving a month’s notice, and calling for three witnesses, makes it a nightmare for those navigating it in the context of inter-religious marriages in India. Combined with anti-conversion laws, which by now twelve states of India have already passed, the moral vigilantism by right-wingers in case of such marriages and over-enthusiastic marriage officers who go beyond the law to question and act on objections, make SMA unattractive. In the background of the queer marriage hearing ongoing in the Supreme Court, which is calling for the amendment of the SMA to allow same-sex marriages, begs the question, can two calls for changes-one progressive and the other regressive be accommodated by the Indian state?
这是两个法律的故事:印度的特殊婚姻法和反皈依法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信