Development of the doctrine of Russian Information Law in the context of the transition to a data economy

Tatiana A. Polyakova
{"title":"Development of the doctrine of Russian Information Law in the context of the transition to a data economy","authors":"Tatiana A. Polyakova","doi":"10.31857/s102694520027660-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of the article analyze the peculiarities of the development of society and the state in the conditions of transition to a new national development project – the data economy, as well as related modern trends in the development of Information Law. The data economy focuses primarily on a practice-oriented approach to the active implementation of domestic developments and the formation of technological sovereignty. The development of such a mechanism should be carried out on the basis of flexible regulation and support of production. As in the digital economy, the flexible regulation approach seems to be a priority in the data economy. But in order to achieve the desired result as quickly as possible, the task is to find new methods and approaches. In this regard, a flexible approach to regulation should be associated with the possibility of creating models for maximum resolution of the introduction and use of technologies with a strictly formally defined system of risks, for the occurrence of which there may be adverse consequences or certain corrective actions under the control of the state. In the article, the authors analyze how methods and approaches to regulating relations in the data economy should change. Awareness of the risks and threats emanating from artificial intelligence determines the question of the development and adoption of special legislation on artificial intelligence, which should be based on the basic federal law on artificial intelligence. The paper presents the arguments “for” and “against” such an act, its content, analyzes approaches to the regulation of individual issues. The problems of legal regulation of metaverses as a space for the development of the data economy are analyzed. It is concluded that a number of problems and risks that we have to face today in the formation of social relations in the metaverse, necessitate the legal regulation of these relations and the development of an integral system of legal norms, including at the level of strategic planning acts. The question of the expediency of using foreign experience in developing a Digital Code (on the example of the Kyrgyz Republic) is considered. In conclusion, the article analyzes the main problems that were discussed at scientific events on the problems of Information Law, including the Sixth Bachilov Readings held in 2023 at the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences.","PeriodicalId":433320,"journal":{"name":"Государство и право","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Государство и право","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520027660-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors of the article analyze the peculiarities of the development of society and the state in the conditions of transition to a new national development project – the data economy, as well as related modern trends in the development of Information Law. The data economy focuses primarily on a practice-oriented approach to the active implementation of domestic developments and the formation of technological sovereignty. The development of such a mechanism should be carried out on the basis of flexible regulation and support of production. As in the digital economy, the flexible regulation approach seems to be a priority in the data economy. But in order to achieve the desired result as quickly as possible, the task is to find new methods and approaches. In this regard, a flexible approach to regulation should be associated with the possibility of creating models for maximum resolution of the introduction and use of technologies with a strictly formally defined system of risks, for the occurrence of which there may be adverse consequences or certain corrective actions under the control of the state. In the article, the authors analyze how methods and approaches to regulating relations in the data economy should change. Awareness of the risks and threats emanating from artificial intelligence determines the question of the development and adoption of special legislation on artificial intelligence, which should be based on the basic federal law on artificial intelligence. The paper presents the arguments “for” and “against” such an act, its content, analyzes approaches to the regulation of individual issues. The problems of legal regulation of metaverses as a space for the development of the data economy are analyzed. It is concluded that a number of problems and risks that we have to face today in the formation of social relations in the metaverse, necessitate the legal regulation of these relations and the development of an integral system of legal norms, including at the level of strategic planning acts. The question of the expediency of using foreign experience in developing a Digital Code (on the example of the Kyrgyz Republic) is considered. In conclusion, the article analyzes the main problems that were discussed at scientific events on the problems of Information Law, including the Sixth Bachilov Readings held in 2023 at the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
在向数据经济过渡的背景下,俄罗斯信息法学说的发展
本文分析了在向数据经济这一新的国家发展项目过渡的条件下,社会和国家发展的特点,以及信息法发展的相关现代趋势。数据经济主要侧重于以实践为导向的方法,积极实施国内发展和形成技术主权。这种机制的发展应在灵活调节和支持生产的基础上进行。与数字经济一样,在数据经济中,灵活的监管方式似乎是一个优先事项。但为了尽快达到预期的效果,任务是寻找新的方法和途径。在这方面,灵活的管理办法应与创造模式的可能性相联系,以便最大限度地解决引进和使用具有严格正式定义的风险系统的技术的问题,如果发生这种情况,可能会产生不利后果或在国家控制下采取某些纠正行动。在本文中,作者分析了数据经济中调节关系的方法和途径应该如何改变。对人工智能带来的风险和威胁的认识决定了制定和通过关于人工智能的专门立法的问题,这些立法应以关于人工智能的联邦基本法律为基础。本文提出了“赞成”和“反对”这一行为的论点,其内容,分析了个别问题的监管方法。分析了作为数据经济发展空间的元数据的法律规制问题。结论是,我们今天在形成社会关系的过程中必须面对的一些问题和风险,需要对这些关系进行法律规范,并制定一套完整的法律规范体系,包括在战略规划行为层面。委员会审议了在制定数字代码时利用外国经验是否方便的问题(以吉尔吉斯共和国为例)。最后,本文分析了在关于信息法问题的科学活动中讨论的主要问题,包括2023年在俄罗斯科学院国家和法律研究所举行的第六次巴基洛夫读书会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信