CALL OF DUTY: HOW TOXICITY CONTINUOUSLY POISONS THE MINDS OF ITS PLAYERS

Miles Lee, Skylar Leung, Jocelyne Lioe
{"title":"CALL OF DUTY: HOW TOXICITY CONTINUOUSLY POISONS THE MINDS OF ITS PLAYERS","authors":"Miles Lee, Skylar Leung, Jocelyne Lioe","doi":"10.46609/ijsser.2023.v08i09.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New multiplayer video games have risen in popularity with many features increasing the accessibility of communication in its diverse community. However, the structure of these games creates a platform for the cycle of discrimination by providing an inconsequential space for the dominant player group: straight white men. We look at examples of minimally moderated communication, character design, game layout, and marketing campaigns in Call of Duty (CoD) to argue how discriminatory behavior is reinforced in a developed subculture. In this paper, we use the feminist and critical race theories, focusing on Johan Huizinga’s theory of the magic circle: a social contract between players with rules in a subspace that is separate from reality. Within the game, an insult is not offensive and instead becomes normalized vocabulary. Through this, CoD problematically reinforces prejudice against people of color and women in the real world, revealing the underlying assumptions and biases of the developers and players towards certain notions of gender and race. We argue that online multiplayer game spaces blur the lines of the magic circle and the players’ view of gender and race is shaped, not from a modern or open-minded perspective, but instead from the rules of a videogame’s subculture.","PeriodicalId":500023,"journal":{"name":"International journal of social science and economic research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of social science and economic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46609/ijsser.2023.v08i09.033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New multiplayer video games have risen in popularity with many features increasing the accessibility of communication in its diverse community. However, the structure of these games creates a platform for the cycle of discrimination by providing an inconsequential space for the dominant player group: straight white men. We look at examples of minimally moderated communication, character design, game layout, and marketing campaigns in Call of Duty (CoD) to argue how discriminatory behavior is reinforced in a developed subculture. In this paper, we use the feminist and critical race theories, focusing on Johan Huizinga’s theory of the magic circle: a social contract between players with rules in a subspace that is separate from reality. Within the game, an insult is not offensive and instead becomes normalized vocabulary. Through this, CoD problematically reinforces prejudice against people of color and women in the real world, revealing the underlying assumptions and biases of the developers and players towards certain notions of gender and race. We argue that online multiplayer game spaces blur the lines of the magic circle and the players’ view of gender and race is shaped, not from a modern or open-minded perspective, but instead from the rules of a videogame’s subculture.
《使命召唤》:毒性如何持续毒害玩家的思想
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信