Scientific racism and racialisation in contemporary Polish empirical research on begging

Tomasz Nowicki
{"title":"Scientific racism and racialisation in contemporary Polish empirical research on begging","authors":"Tomasz Nowicki","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Polish debate and research on begging, there is a tendency to combine this topic with social pathologies, culture, skin colour and race. Due to the use of the above-mentioned categories in the discussed research, I adopted the perspective of the postcolonial theory as the appropriate method of analysing the scientific discourse on begging. Based on the empirical research analysed in the article, I show that the ethical standards used in the research are inconsistent with the UNESCO Experts’ Declaration developed in the mid-twentieth century, recognising the category of race as unscientific. A practice of particular concern in this regard is the coding of empirical data based on racial categories imposed on Roma in the context of identifying begging with criminality. Within these approaches, I identified the essential and cultural approach to begging and the concept of a happy beggar created on its basis. On the other hand, at the level of content and conclusions, the ideological stake of the analyses carried out, aimed at rationing the social usefulness of work and its control, is revealed. In this context, the emerging aim of the research and tasks of the social assistance system is to “provide care” for the activity of citizens and forcing the population able to work to undertake it.","PeriodicalId":475742,"journal":{"name":"Praca Socjalna","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praca Socjalna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Polish debate and research on begging, there is a tendency to combine this topic with social pathologies, culture, skin colour and race. Due to the use of the above-mentioned categories in the discussed research, I adopted the perspective of the postcolonial theory as the appropriate method of analysing the scientific discourse on begging. Based on the empirical research analysed in the article, I show that the ethical standards used in the research are inconsistent with the UNESCO Experts’ Declaration developed in the mid-twentieth century, recognising the category of race as unscientific. A practice of particular concern in this regard is the coding of empirical data based on racial categories imposed on Roma in the context of identifying begging with criminality. Within these approaches, I identified the essential and cultural approach to begging and the concept of a happy beggar created on its basis. On the other hand, at the level of content and conclusions, the ideological stake of the analyses carried out, aimed at rationing the social usefulness of work and its control, is revealed. In this context, the emerging aim of the research and tasks of the social assistance system is to “provide care” for the activity of citizens and forcing the population able to work to undertake it.
当代波兰乞讨实证研究中的科学种族主义与种族化
在波兰关于乞讨的辩论和研究中,人们倾向于将这个话题与社会病态、文化、肤色和种族结合起来。由于在讨论的研究中使用了上述类别,我采用后殖民理论的视角作为分析乞讨科学话语的适当方法。基于文章中分析的实证研究,我表明研究中使用的伦理标准与20世纪中叶制定的联合国教科文组织专家宣言不一致,该宣言承认种族类别是不科学的。在这方面特别令人关切的一种做法是在确定乞讨为犯罪的情况下,根据强加给罗姆人的种族类别对经验数据进行编码。在这些方法中,我确定了乞讨的基本和文化方法,以及在此基础上创造的快乐乞丐的概念。另一方面,在内容和结论的层面上,揭示了所进行的分析的意识形态利害关系,其目的是定量分配工作的社会有用性及其控制。在这方面,社会援助系统的研究和任务的新目标是为公民的活动“提供照顾”,并迫使有工作能力的人口承担这些活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信