Critical Reflection on Design Thinking Education and Exploration of New Possibilities

Eun Sun Park, Hyunjae Shin
{"title":"Critical Reflection on Design Thinking Education and Exploration of New Possibilities","authors":"Eun Sun Park, Hyunjae Shin","doi":"10.35283/erft.2023.36.3.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study critically reflects on Design Thinking and addresses the issue of positivist-based domestic design education. It examines the production of knowledge in design by reviewing discussions in natural science and social science. Through this examination, the study identifies the problems associated with the rigid and linear structure of Design Thinking. Moreover, it emphasizes the necessity of an educational inquiry centered on design thinking and future-oriented values, aiming to explore possibilities through abductive and retroductive reasoning. A conceptual model of design thinking is presented as an approach process that generates new knowledge through imagination and the exploration of possibilities. The study also suggests the need for speculative and critical design education to foster this approach.
 However, it is important to note that the proposed tentative design thinking model is described only conceptually in this study. To expand the exploration of knowledge and approaches in multiple layers, a follow-up study that critically and closely diagnoses and analyzes domestic design-related education will be required. Additionally, there is a need to accumulate the value of design thinking by implementing new approaches in various cases.
 While the significance of deductive and inductive positivist research cannot be disregarded, as it is an important component in many areas of research and education, these approaches alone may not effectively address complex social problems. Overcoming the limitations of design thinking requires training in speculative thinking to discover hypotheses for untested areas beyond experience-based testing. Recognizing the value of this approach and promoting diversity and balance in research methods are essential factors in advancing the field.","PeriodicalId":491638,"journal":{"name":"미래교육학연구","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"미래교육학연구","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35283/erft.2023.36.3.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study critically reflects on Design Thinking and addresses the issue of positivist-based domestic design education. It examines the production of knowledge in design by reviewing discussions in natural science and social science. Through this examination, the study identifies the problems associated with the rigid and linear structure of Design Thinking. Moreover, it emphasizes the necessity of an educational inquiry centered on design thinking and future-oriented values, aiming to explore possibilities through abductive and retroductive reasoning. A conceptual model of design thinking is presented as an approach process that generates new knowledge through imagination and the exploration of possibilities. The study also suggests the need for speculative and critical design education to foster this approach. However, it is important to note that the proposed tentative design thinking model is described only conceptually in this study. To expand the exploration of knowledge and approaches in multiple layers, a follow-up study that critically and closely diagnoses and analyzes domestic design-related education will be required. Additionally, there is a need to accumulate the value of design thinking by implementing new approaches in various cases. While the significance of deductive and inductive positivist research cannot be disregarded, as it is an important component in many areas of research and education, these approaches alone may not effectively address complex social problems. Overcoming the limitations of design thinking requires training in speculative thinking to discover hypotheses for untested areas beyond experience-based testing. Recognizing the value of this approach and promoting diversity and balance in research methods are essential factors in advancing the field.
设计思维教育的批判性反思与新可能性的探索
本研究对设计思维进行批判性反思,并探讨实证主义的国内设计教育问题。它通过回顾自然科学和社会科学的讨论来检查设计知识的生产。通过这种检查,研究确定了与设计思维的刚性和线性结构相关的问题。此外,它强调以设计思维和面向未来的价值观为中心的教育探究的必要性,旨在通过溯因推理和溯因推理探索可能性。设计思维的概念模型是一种通过想象和探索可能性产生新知识的方法过程。该研究还表明,需要进行思辨性和批判性的设计教育来培养这种方法。 然而,值得注意的是,本研究中提出的试探性设计思维模型仅在概念上进行了描述。为了扩大对知识和方法的多层次探索,需要一项对国内设计相关教育进行批判性和密切诊断和分析的后续研究。此外,有必要通过在各种情况下实施新方法来积累设计思维的价值。 虽然演绎和归纳实证主义研究的重要性不容忽视,因为它是许多研究和教育领域的重要组成部分,但这些方法本身可能无法有效地解决复杂的社会问题。克服设计思维的局限性需要训练思辨思维,以发现基于经验的测试之外未测试领域的假设。认识到这种方法的价值,促进研究方法的多样性和平衡是推动该领域发展的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信