‘Selective historians’: The construction of cisness in Byzantine and Byzantinist texts

IF 0.3 3区历史学 Q2 HISTORY

Gender and History Pub Date : 2023-11-12 DOI:10.1111/1468-0424.12754

Ilya Maude

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Far from being a natural, prelapsarian state, cisness is a hegemonic ideal of gender performance demanded of all people. This article explores the construction of cisness in the field of Byzantine studies, and the historiographical tropes through which it is maintained, naturalised and made invisible. It uses analysis of hegemonic cisness in Byzantine studies to suggest new avenues of investigation for Byzantine gender history. It proposes ‘cisness’ as method; a focal point for historical and historiographical investigation. It asks, was there cisness in Byzantium? If so, did it resemble ours?

查看原文本刊更多论文

选择性的历史学家"：拜占庭和拜占庭主义文本中的性别建构

阴阳人远非一种自然的、先天的状态，而是一种要求所有人都具备的性别表现的霸权理想。本文探讨了拜占庭研究领域对顺式性别的建构，以及将其维持、归化并使其隐形的史学套路。文章通过分析拜占庭研究中的霸权 "顺性别"，为拜占庭性别史提出了新的研究途径。它提出 "顺式 "是一种方法，是历史和史学研究的焦点。它问道：拜占庭是否存在顺式性别？如果有，是否与我们相似？

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Gender and History Multiple-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Gender & History is now established as the major international journal for research and writing on the history of femininity and masculinity and of gender relations. Spanning epochs and continents, Gender & History examines changing conceptions of gender, and maps the dialogue between femininities, masculinities and their historical contexts. The journal publishes rigorous and readable articles both on particular episodes in gender history and on broader methodological questions which have ramifications for the discipline as a whole.