A pulmonary rehabilitation program reduces hospitalizations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A cost-effectiveness study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Maria Elena Toubes-Navarro, Francisco Gude-Sampedro, José Manuel Álvarez-Dobaño, Francisco Reyes-Santias, Carlos Rábade-Castedo, Carlota Rodríguez-García, Óscar Lado-Baleato, Raquel Lago-Fidalgo, Noelia Sánchez-Martínez, Jorge Ricoy-Gabaldón, Ana Casal-Mouriño, Romina Abelleira-Paris, Vanessa Riveiro-Blanco, Carlos Zamarrón-Sanz, Nuria Rodríguez-Núñez, Adriana Lama-López, Lucía Ferreiro-Fernández, Luis Valdés-Cuadrado
{"title":"A pulmonary rehabilitation program reduces hospitalizations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A cost-effectiveness study","authors":"Maria Elena Toubes-Navarro, Francisco Gude-Sampedro, José Manuel Álvarez-Dobaño, Francisco Reyes-Santias, Carlos Rábade-Castedo, Carlota Rodríguez-García, Óscar Lado-Baleato, Raquel Lago-Fidalgo, Noelia Sánchez-Martínez, Jorge Ricoy-Gabaldón, Ana Casal-Mouriño, Romina Abelleira-Paris, Vanessa Riveiro-Blanco, Carlos Zamarrón-Sanz, Nuria Rodríguez-Núñez, Adriana Lama-López, Lucía Ferreiro-Fernández, Luis Valdés-Cuadrado","doi":"10.4103/atm.atm_70_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a scarcity of data demonstrating the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of PR in reducing exacerbations. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study in 200 patients with COPD was conducted to determine the number of exacerbations 1 year before and after their participation in a PR program. Quality of life was measured using the COPD assessment test and EuroQol-5D. The costs of the program and exacerbations were assessed the year before and after participation in the PR program. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The number of admissions, length of hospital stay, and admissions to the emergency department decreased after participation in the PR program by 48.2%, 46.6%, and 42.5%, respectively ( P < 0.001 for all). Results on quality of life tests improved significantly ( P < 0.001 for the two tests). The cost of PR per patient and the cost of pre-PR and post-PR exacerbations were €1867.7 and €7895.2 and €4201.9, respectively. The PR resulted in a cost saving of €1826 (total, €365,200) per patient/year, and the gain in QALYs was+0.107. ICER was −€17,056. The total cost was <€20,000/QALY in 78% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PR contributes to reducing the number of exacerbations in patients with COPD, thereby slowing clinical deterioration. In addition, it is cost-effective in terms of QALYs.","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_70_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a scarcity of data demonstrating the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of PR in reducing exacerbations. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study in 200 patients with COPD was conducted to determine the number of exacerbations 1 year before and after their participation in a PR program. Quality of life was measured using the COPD assessment test and EuroQol-5D. The costs of the program and exacerbations were assessed the year before and after participation in the PR program. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The number of admissions, length of hospital stay, and admissions to the emergency department decreased after participation in the PR program by 48.2%, 46.6%, and 42.5%, respectively ( P < 0.001 for all). Results on quality of life tests improved significantly ( P < 0.001 for the two tests). The cost of PR per patient and the cost of pre-PR and post-PR exacerbations were €1867.7 and €7895.2 and €4201.9, respectively. The PR resulted in a cost saving of €1826 (total, €365,200) per patient/year, and the gain in QALYs was+0.107. ICER was −€17,056. The total cost was <€20,000/QALY in 78% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PR contributes to reducing the number of exacerbations in patients with COPD, thereby slowing clinical deterioration. In addition, it is cost-effective in terms of QALYs.
肺康复计划减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者住院:一项成本效益研究
摘要:背景:虽然肺康复(PR)被推荐用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者,但缺乏数据证明PR在减少病情恶化方面的成本效益和有效性。方法:对200名COPD患者进行了一项准实验研究,以确定他们参加PR计划前后一年的加重次数。使用COPD评估试验和EuroQol-5D来测量生活质量。在参与公关项目的前后一年,评估了项目的成本和恶化情况。增量成本-效果比(ICER)以质量调整寿命年(QALYs)估算。结果:参与PR项目后,入院人数、住院时间和急诊科入院人数分别下降了48.2%、46.6%和42.5% (P <0.001)。生活质量测试结果显著改善(P <两个测试为0.001)。每位患者的PR成本以及PR前和PR后加重的成本分别为1867.7欧元、7895.2欧元和4201.9欧元。PR为每位患者每年节省了1826欧元(总计365,200欧元)的成本,QALYs的收益为+0.107。ICER为- 17,056欧元。78%的患者的总成本为20,000欧元/QALY。结论:PR有助于减少COPD患者的加重次数,从而减缓临床恶化。此外,它在QALYs方面具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Annals of Thoracic Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信