Outside Joke: Virginia Woolf’s Freshwater and Coterie Insularity

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Michelle Alexis Taylor
{"title":"Outside Joke: Virginia Woolf’s <i>Freshwater</i> and Coterie Insularity","authors":"Michelle Alexis Taylor","doi":"10.3366/mod.2023.0403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay reads Virginia Woolf’s play Freshwater as a coterie parlour theatrical, focusing on both the 1923 draft and the 1935 playscript. Scholars of both Woolf’s writings and of Bloomsbury’s coterie culture have long read the play as a modernist’s satire of the aesthetics and politics of Victorian culture. My reading challenges such a straightforward understanding of Woolf’s satire, suggesting that the play’s mockery is in fact directed inward, at Bloomsbury and at the insularity of coterie culture itself. I argue that attending to both scripts as coterie texts – i.e., texts meant for restricted consumption and production, defined by both their limited circulation and their metacommunicative capacity – recuperates these critiques, which are specific not only to Woolf’s restricted audience, but to the players for whom her roles were designed. By looking at the evolution of the play between its first 1923 draft and its 1935 performance text, too, I trace a narrative of Woolf’s disappointed hopes, one that wraps up the ‘failure’ of modernism with the failure of coterie’s queer kinship to displace the classed, heteronormative Victorian family, as well as the failure of modernism’s other social experiments to effect broader social and cultural change.","PeriodicalId":41937,"journal":{"name":"Modernist Cultures","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modernist Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/mod.2023.0403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay reads Virginia Woolf’s play Freshwater as a coterie parlour theatrical, focusing on both the 1923 draft and the 1935 playscript. Scholars of both Woolf’s writings and of Bloomsbury’s coterie culture have long read the play as a modernist’s satire of the aesthetics and politics of Victorian culture. My reading challenges such a straightforward understanding of Woolf’s satire, suggesting that the play’s mockery is in fact directed inward, at Bloomsbury and at the insularity of coterie culture itself. I argue that attending to both scripts as coterie texts – i.e., texts meant for restricted consumption and production, defined by both their limited circulation and their metacommunicative capacity – recuperates these critiques, which are specific not only to Woolf’s restricted audience, but to the players for whom her roles were designed. By looking at the evolution of the play between its first 1923 draft and its 1935 performance text, too, I trace a narrative of Woolf’s disappointed hopes, one that wraps up the ‘failure’ of modernism with the failure of coterie’s queer kinship to displace the classed, heteronormative Victorian family, as well as the failure of modernism’s other social experiments to effect broader social and cultural change.
外面的笑话:弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的淡水和小圈子的孤立
本文将弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的戏剧《淡水》作为一个小圈子的客厅戏剧来阅读,重点关注1923年的草稿和1935年的剧本。研究伍尔夫作品和布卢姆斯伯里文化圈的学者们长期以来都把这部剧看作是现代主义者对维多利亚文化美学和政治的讽刺。我的阅读挑战了这种对伍尔夫讽刺的直接理解,暗示戏剧的嘲弄实际上是指向内部的,针对布卢姆茨伯里派和小圈子文化本身的狭隘。我认为,把这两个剧本都当作小圈子文本——即,被限制消费和生产的文本,由它们有限的流通和元传播能力所定义——恢复了这些批评,这些批评不仅针对伍尔夫有限的观众,而且针对她的角色所设计的参与者。通过观察这部戏剧在1923年初稿和1935年演出文本之间的演变,我也追溯了伍尔夫失望的希望的叙述,一个将现代主义的“失败”与小圈子的酷儿亲属关系取代阶级的失败,异性恋的维多利亚家庭,以及现代主义的其他社会实验的失败,以影响更广泛的社会和文化变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modernist Cultures
Modernist Cultures HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信