ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS): Validation in Spanish in adult population according to the DSM-5

0 PSYCHIATRY
Aldo Pereira , Vanesa Richarte , Christian Fadeuilhe , Montse Corrales , Estela García , Josep Antoni Ramos-Quiroga
{"title":"ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS): Validation in Spanish in adult population according to the DSM-5","authors":"Aldo Pereira ,&nbsp;Vanesa Richarte ,&nbsp;Christian Fadeuilhe ,&nbsp;Montse Corrales ,&nbsp;Estela García ,&nbsp;Josep Antoni Ramos-Quiroga","doi":"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common childhood neurodevelopmental disorder, with an estimated prevalence in adulthood of 2.5–3.4%. The Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) is an 18-item self-administered scale that assesses attention deficit and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms of ADHD in adults. This study aims to validate the ADHD-RS in Spanish according to the diagnostic criteria established by the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A sample of 441 adult patients (mean age 33.34<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11.37 years) was included, 396 subjects were diagnosed with ADHD (mean age 33.17<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11.18 years), and 45 were controls (mean age 35.40<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12.33 years). The clinical diagnosis of ADHD was established according to the DSM-5 criteria. The ADHD-RS was subsequently administered to all participants.</p><p>A logistic regression study evaluated the model in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure was performed to assess the adequacy of the data set, and to determine whether factor analysis was applicable, Bartlett's sphericity test was performed.</p><p>Principal component analysis was used, using the Varimax orthogonal rotation method, which minimizes the number of variables with high loads on each factor, obtaining two factors and thus, simplifying their interpretation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The cut-off point that best discriminates the combined presentation of ADHD was 24 points, with a sensitivity of 94.78%, a specificity of 84.79%, a PPV (positive predictive value) of 93.74%, and an NPV (negative predictive value) of 78.33, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, and a kappa coefficient of 0.86.</p><p>Regarding inattentive ADHD, the cut-off point that best discriminates was 21 points, with a sensitivity of 92.56%, a specificity of 76.26%, a PPV of 92.01%, an NPV of 78.33%, an AUC of 0.90, and a kappa coefficient of 0.87.</p><p>Different cut-off values in the two subgroups suggests that a differentiated cut-off point for the inattentive and combined presentations may be an adequate assessment strategy for ADHD in adulthood.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Spanish version of the ADHD-RS is a valid instrument to evaluate ADHD in adults according to the diagnostic criteria established by the DSM-5.</p><p>Differentiated cut-off points for the inattentive and combined presentations discriminate more accurately than a single cut-off point.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"17 1","pages":"Pages 46-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950285323000145/pdfft?md5=aa4f589b5a4eac98d0edcc5fcce930a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2950285323000145-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950285323000145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common childhood neurodevelopmental disorder, with an estimated prevalence in adulthood of 2.5–3.4%. The Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) is an 18-item self-administered scale that assesses attention deficit and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms of ADHD in adults. This study aims to validate the ADHD-RS in Spanish according to the diagnostic criteria established by the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).

Materials and methods

A sample of 441 adult patients (mean age 33.34 ± 11.37 years) was included, 396 subjects were diagnosed with ADHD (mean age 33.17 ± 11.18 years), and 45 were controls (mean age 35.40 ± 12.33 years). The clinical diagnosis of ADHD was established according to the DSM-5 criteria. The ADHD-RS was subsequently administered to all participants.

A logistic regression study evaluated the model in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure was performed to assess the adequacy of the data set, and to determine whether factor analysis was applicable, Bartlett's sphericity test was performed.

Principal component analysis was used, using the Varimax orthogonal rotation method, which minimizes the number of variables with high loads on each factor, obtaining two factors and thus, simplifying their interpretation.

Results

The cut-off point that best discriminates the combined presentation of ADHD was 24 points, with a sensitivity of 94.78%, a specificity of 84.79%, a PPV (positive predictive value) of 93.74%, and an NPV (negative predictive value) of 78.33, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, and a kappa coefficient of 0.86.

Regarding inattentive ADHD, the cut-off point that best discriminates was 21 points, with a sensitivity of 92.56%, a specificity of 76.26%, a PPV of 92.01%, an NPV of 78.33%, an AUC of 0.90, and a kappa coefficient of 0.87.

Different cut-off values in the two subgroups suggests that a differentiated cut-off point for the inattentive and combined presentations may be an adequate assessment strategy for ADHD in adulthood.

Conclusions

The Spanish version of the ADHD-RS is a valid instrument to evaluate ADHD in adults according to the diagnostic criteria established by the DSM-5.

Differentiated cut-off points for the inattentive and combined presentations discriminate more accurately than a single cut-off point.

多动症评定量表(ADHD-RS):根据 DSM-5,在西班牙语成人人群中进行验证
导言注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是最常见的儿童神经发育障碍,成年后的患病率估计为 2.5-3.4%。注意力缺陷/多动障碍评定量表(ADHD-RS)是一种 18 项自编量表,用于评估成人注意力缺陷和多动/冲动症状。本研究旨在根据第 5 版《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)制定的诊断标准,验证西班牙文 ADHD-RS 的有效性。多动症的临床诊断是根据 DSM-5 标准确定的。一项逻辑回归研究从灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值方面对模型进行了评估。为了评估数据集的充分性,我们采用了凯泽-迈耶-奥尔金(KMO)测量法,为了确定是否适用因子分析,我们进行了巴特利特球形度检验。我们使用了主成分分析法,采用了瓦里马克斯正交旋转法,这种方法可以最大限度地减少每个因子上高负荷变量的数量,从而得到两个因子,从而简化了对因子的解释。结果最能区分多动症综合表现的临界点为 24 点,灵敏度为 94.78%,特异度为 84.79%,PPV(阳性预测值)为 93.74%,NPV(阴性预测值)为 78.33,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.85,卡帕系数为 0.86。两个亚组的截断值不同,表明针对注意力不集中和合并表现的截断值不同,这可能是评估成年期多动症的适当策略。结论 西班牙语版 ADHD-RS 是根据 DSM-5 确立的诊断标准评估成人多动症的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信