Antioxidant activity of radish seed oil and the quality and storage characteristics of pork patties with added radish seed oil

IF 4.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
soyoung Jang, Chaeri Kim, Sanghun Park, Yunhwan Park, Gyutae Park, Sehyuk Oh, Nayoung Choi, Youngho Lim, Jusung Cho, Jungseok Choi
{"title":"Antioxidant activity of radish seed oil and the quality and storage characteristics of pork patties with added radish seed oil","authors":"soyoung Jang, Chaeri Kim, Sanghun Park, Yunhwan Park, Gyutae Park, Sehyuk Oh, Nayoung Choi, Youngho Lim, Jusung Cho, Jungseok Choi","doi":"10.5851/kosfa.2023.e71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the antioxidant activity of radish seed oil (RSO) and its effects on the quality and storage characteristics of pork patties. To assess the antioxidant capacity of RSO, this study analyzed fatty acid composition, peroxide value (PV), and DPPH radical scavenging activity. Pork patties were manufactured with the addition of RSO—0.4%, 0.8%, 1.6%, and 2.4%—and measured in terms of proximate composition, pH, water holding capacity (WHC), cooking loss (CL), color, texture profile analysis (TPA), and a sensory evaluation. Total microbial count (TMC), volatile basic nitrogen (VBN), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), and PV were measured at 1, 3, and 7 days of refrigerated storage. The DPPH radical scavenging activity of RSO was found to be 75.46%. In the cases of WHC and CL, there was no significant differences observed between RSO0.4%, RSO0.8%, and positive control (PC) (p>0.05). Meanwhile, RSO2.4% showed significantly lower hardness, springiness, gumminess, and chewiness than PC (p<0.05), and these values tended to decrease with the addition of increasing RSO. In terms of storage characteristics, with an increase in the amount of RSO added, TMC, VBN, TBARS, and PV all decreased; among the treatment groups, RSO2.4% showed the lowest values. In conclusion, RSO exhibits antioxidant activity, but when added in large amounts, it negatively affects the quality characteristics of patties while positively impacting their storage properties, thus necessitating a balanced consideration of both outcomes. Therefore, adding 1.6% RSO is considered to be the most appropriate level for formulations to be used in practice.","PeriodicalId":12459,"journal":{"name":"Food Science of Animal Resources","volume":"37 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science of Animal Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e71","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the antioxidant activity of radish seed oil (RSO) and its effects on the quality and storage characteristics of pork patties. To assess the antioxidant capacity of RSO, this study analyzed fatty acid composition, peroxide value (PV), and DPPH radical scavenging activity. Pork patties were manufactured with the addition of RSO—0.4%, 0.8%, 1.6%, and 2.4%—and measured in terms of proximate composition, pH, water holding capacity (WHC), cooking loss (CL), color, texture profile analysis (TPA), and a sensory evaluation. Total microbial count (TMC), volatile basic nitrogen (VBN), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), and PV were measured at 1, 3, and 7 days of refrigerated storage. The DPPH radical scavenging activity of RSO was found to be 75.46%. In the cases of WHC and CL, there was no significant differences observed between RSO0.4%, RSO0.8%, and positive control (PC) (p>0.05). Meanwhile, RSO2.4% showed significantly lower hardness, springiness, gumminess, and chewiness than PC (p<0.05), and these values tended to decrease with the addition of increasing RSO. In terms of storage characteristics, with an increase in the amount of RSO added, TMC, VBN, TBARS, and PV all decreased; among the treatment groups, RSO2.4% showed the lowest values. In conclusion, RSO exhibits antioxidant activity, but when added in large amounts, it negatively affects the quality characteristics of patties while positively impacting their storage properties, thus necessitating a balanced consideration of both outcomes. Therefore, adding 1.6% RSO is considered to be the most appropriate level for formulations to be used in practice.
萝卜籽油的抗氧化活性及添加萝卜籽油猪肉肉饼的品质和贮藏特性
研究了萝卜籽油(RSO)的抗氧化活性及其对肉饼品质和贮藏特性的影响。为了评估RSO的抗氧化能力,本研究分析了脂肪酸组成、过氧化值(PV)和DPPH自由基清除活性。在猪肉肉饼中分别添加0.4%、0.8%、1.6%和2.4%的rso,并测量其近似组成、pH值、持水量(WHC)、蒸煮损失(CL)、颜色、质地分析(TPA)和感官评价。在冷藏1、3、7 d时测定总微生物数量(TMC)、挥发性碱性氮(VBN)、硫代巴比妥酸活性物质(TBARS)和PV。RSO对DPPH自由基的清除活性为75.46%。在WHC和CL病例中,RSO0.4%、RSO0.8%与阳性对照(PC)之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。同时,RSO2.4%的硬度、弹性、胶性和咀嚼性均显著低于PC (p<0.05),且随RSO添加量的增加,这些指标均有降低的趋势。在存储特性方面,随着RSO添加量的增加,TMC、VBN、TBARS和PV均降低;各治疗组中RSO2.4%值最低。综上所述,RSO具有抗氧化活性,但当大量添加时,它会对肉饼的品质特性产生负面影响,同时对其储存性能产生积极影响,因此需要平衡考虑这两种结果。因此,对于实际使用的配方,添加1.6% RSO被认为是最合适的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Science of Animal Resources
Food Science of Animal Resources Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Food Science of Animal Resources (Food Sci. Anim. Resour.) is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research and review articles on scientific and technological aspects of chemistry, biotechnology, processing, engineering, and microbiology of meat, egg, dairy, and edible insect/worm products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信