Development of newborn screening policies in Spain 2003-2022: what do we actually need to reach an agreement?

Cristina Valcárcel-Nazco, Lidia García-Pérez, Renata Linertová, Carmen Guirado-Fuentes, Aránzazu Hernández-Yumar, Lucinda Paz-Valiñas, Paula Cantero-Muñoz, Manuel Posada, Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
{"title":"Development of newborn screening policies in Spain 2003-2022: what do we actually need to reach an agreement?","authors":"Cristina Valcárcel-Nazco, Lidia García-Pérez, Renata Linertová, Carmen Guirado-Fuentes, Aránzazu Hernández-Yumar, Lucinda Paz-Valiñas, Paula Cantero-Muñoz, Manuel Posada, Pedro Serrano-Aguilar","doi":"10.20517/rdodj.2023.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Newborn screening (NBS) for inherited disorders is recognized as an essential public health intervention to improve health outcomes in the newborn population. The implementation of an NBS programme requires an evaluation of effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, feasibility, and budget impact. Determining which of the known disorders should be included in NBS programmes is a public health policy challenge. In this context, economic evaluation aims to contribute to the sustainability of public health systems, but the appropriate economic evaluation framework for these interventions is still unclear. Existing NBS programmes vary widely in the number and type of disorders screened, even among the most developed European countries, despite the fact that the core criteria for guiding policy decision-making are standard. In Spain, where delivery of NBS programmes is marked by heterogeneity between regions, guidelines based on the best available scientific evidence are being established in order to achieve standardization of NBS policies and programmes at a national level. This paper provides a general overview of existing evidence-based health-policy initiatives aimed at enhancing the equity and efficiency of the NBS programme in Spain and their impact on health decisions. We also describe existing challenges to reduce uncertainty, and the variations observed in decisions relating to the content and procedures used in NBS programmes.","PeriodicalId":74638,"journal":{"name":"Rare disease and orphan drugs journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rare disease and orphan drugs journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/rdodj.2023.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) for inherited disorders is recognized as an essential public health intervention to improve health outcomes in the newborn population. The implementation of an NBS programme requires an evaluation of effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, feasibility, and budget impact. Determining which of the known disorders should be included in NBS programmes is a public health policy challenge. In this context, economic evaluation aims to contribute to the sustainability of public health systems, but the appropriate economic evaluation framework for these interventions is still unclear. Existing NBS programmes vary widely in the number and type of disorders screened, even among the most developed European countries, despite the fact that the core criteria for guiding policy decision-making are standard. In Spain, where delivery of NBS programmes is marked by heterogeneity between regions, guidelines based on the best available scientific evidence are being established in order to achieve standardization of NBS policies and programmes at a national level. This paper provides a general overview of existing evidence-based health-policy initiatives aimed at enhancing the equity and efficiency of the NBS programme in Spain and their impact on health decisions. We also describe existing challenges to reduce uncertainty, and the variations observed in decisions relating to the content and procedures used in NBS programmes.
2003-2022年西班牙新生儿筛查政策的发展:我们实际上需要达成什么协议?
新生儿遗传疾病筛查(NBS)被认为是改善新生儿健康结果的重要公共卫生干预措施。国家统计局计划的实施需要对有效性、安全性、成本效益、可行性和预算影响进行评估。确定哪些已知疾病应纳入国家统计局规划是一项公共卫生政策挑战。在这种情况下,经济评价旨在促进公共卫生系统的可持续性,但这些干预措施的适当经济评价框架仍然不清楚。尽管指导政策决策的核心标准是标准的,但国家统计局现有规划在筛查疾病的数量和类型上差别很大,即使在最发达的欧洲国家也是如此。在西班牙,国家统计局规划的实施在各地区之间存在差异,因此正在根据现有的最佳科学证据制定指导方针,以便在国家一级实现国家统计局政策和规划的标准化。本文概述了旨在提高西班牙国家统计局方案的公平性和效率及其对卫生决策的影响的现有循证卫生政策举措。我们还描述了减少不确定性的现有挑战,以及在与国家统计局计划中使用的内容和程序相关的决策中观察到的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信