Sex disparities in outcomes after carotid artery interventions: A systematic review

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Yana Etkin , Lisa Iyeke , Grace Yu , Isra Ahmed , Pasquale Matera , Jonathan Aminov , Angela Kokkosis , Laurel Hastings , Karan Garg , Caron Rockman
{"title":"Sex disparities in outcomes after carotid artery interventions: A systematic review","authors":"Yana Etkin ,&nbsp;Lisa Iyeke ,&nbsp;Grace Yu ,&nbsp;Isra Ahmed ,&nbsp;Pasquale Matera ,&nbsp;Jonathan Aminov ,&nbsp;Angela Kokkosis ,&nbsp;Laurel Hastings ,&nbsp;Karan Garg ,&nbsp;Caron Rockman","doi":"10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2023.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>This systematic review aimed to identify sex-specific outcomes in men and women after </span>carotid endarterectomy<span> (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), including transfemoral and transcarotid. A search of literature published from January 2000 through December 2022 was conducted using key terms attributed to </span></span>carotid interventions<span> on PubMed. Studies comparing outcome metrics post intervention (ie, myocardial infarction [MI], cerebral vascular accident [CVA] or stroke, and long-term mortality) among male and female patients were reviewed. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Overall, all studies reported low rates of perioperative complications. Among the studies that did not stratify outcomes by the preoperative symptom status, there were no significant sex differences in rates of perioperative strokes or MIs. Two studies, however, noted a higher rate of 30-day mortality in male patients undergoing CEA than in female patients. Analysis of asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA revealed no difference in perioperative MIs (female: 0% to 1.8% </span></span><em>v</em> male: 0.4% to 4.3%), similar rates of CVAs (female: 0.8% to 5% <em>v</em> male: 0.8% to 4.9%), and no significant differences in the long-term mortality outcomes. Alternatively, symptomatic patients undergoing CEA reported a higher rate of CVAs in female patients vs. male patients (7.7% <em>v</em> 6.2%) and showed a higher rate of death in female patients (1% <em>v</em><span> 0.7%). Among studies that did not stratify outcome by symptomatology, there was no difference in the 30-day outcomes between sexes for patients undergoing CAS. Asymptomatic patients undergoing CAS demonstrated similar incident rates across perioperative MIs (female: 0% to 5.9% </span><em>v</em> male: 0.28% to 3.3%), CVAs (female: 0.5% to 4.1% <em>v</em> male: 0.4% to 6.2%), and long-term mortality outcomes (female: 0% to 1.75% <em>v</em> male: 0.2% to 1.5%). Symptomatic patients undergoing CAS similarly reported higher incidences of perioperative MIs (female: 0.3% to 7.1% <em>v</em> male: 0% to 5.5%), CVAs (female: 0% to 9.9% <em>v</em> male: 0% to 7.6%), and long-term mortality outcomes (female: 0.6% to 7.1% <em>v</em> male: 0.5% to 8.2%). Sex-specific differences in outcomes after major vascular procedures are well recognized. Our review suggests that symptomatic female patients have a higher incidence of neurologic and cardiac events after carotid interventions, but that asymptomatic patients do not.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895796723000686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to identify sex-specific outcomes in men and women after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), including transfemoral and transcarotid. A search of literature published from January 2000 through December 2022 was conducted using key terms attributed to carotid interventions on PubMed. Studies comparing outcome metrics post intervention (ie, myocardial infarction [MI], cerebral vascular accident [CVA] or stroke, and long-term mortality) among male and female patients were reviewed. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Overall, all studies reported low rates of perioperative complications. Among the studies that did not stratify outcomes by the preoperative symptom status, there were no significant sex differences in rates of perioperative strokes or MIs. Two studies, however, noted a higher rate of 30-day mortality in male patients undergoing CEA than in female patients. Analysis of asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA revealed no difference in perioperative MIs (female: 0% to 1.8% v male: 0.4% to 4.3%), similar rates of CVAs (female: 0.8% to 5% v male: 0.8% to 4.9%), and no significant differences in the long-term mortality outcomes. Alternatively, symptomatic patients undergoing CEA reported a higher rate of CVAs in female patients vs. male patients (7.7% v 6.2%) and showed a higher rate of death in female patients (1% v 0.7%). Among studies that did not stratify outcome by symptomatology, there was no difference in the 30-day outcomes between sexes for patients undergoing CAS. Asymptomatic patients undergoing CAS demonstrated similar incident rates across perioperative MIs (female: 0% to 5.9% v male: 0.28% to 3.3%), CVAs (female: 0.5% to 4.1% v male: 0.4% to 6.2%), and long-term mortality outcomes (female: 0% to 1.75% v male: 0.2% to 1.5%). Symptomatic patients undergoing CAS similarly reported higher incidences of perioperative MIs (female: 0.3% to 7.1% v male: 0% to 5.5%), CVAs (female: 0% to 9.9% v male: 0% to 7.6%), and long-term mortality outcomes (female: 0.6% to 7.1% v male: 0.5% to 8.2%). Sex-specific differences in outcomes after major vascular procedures are well recognized. Our review suggests that symptomatic female patients have a higher incidence of neurologic and cardiac events after carotid interventions, but that asymptomatic patients do not.

颈动脉介入治疗后结果的性别差异
本系统综述旨在确定经颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)(包括经股动脉和经颈动脉)后男性和女性的性别特异性结局。检索2000年1月1日至2022年12月期间发表的文献,利用PubMed上归因于颈动脉干预的关键术语进行检索。我们回顾了比较男性和女性患者干预后结局指标(心肌梗死(MI)、卒中(CVA)和长期死亡率)的研究。遵循PRISMA指南。总的来说,所有的研究报告围手术期并发症的发生率很低。在未按术前症状状态对结果进行分层的研究中,围手术期卒中或Mis的发生率没有显著的性别差异。然而,两项研究指出,接受CEA的男性患者的30天死亡率高于女性患者。对接受CEA的无症状患者的分析显示,围手术期MIs (F: 0-1.8% vs. M: 0.4-4.3%)、cva发生率相似(F: 0.8- 5% vs. M: 0.8-4.9%)、长期死亡率结局无显著差异。另外,接受CEA的有症状患者报告的女性cva发生率高于男性(7.7%对6.2%),女性死亡率高于男性(1%对0.7%)。在没有根据症状对结果进行分层的研究中,接受CAS的患者的30天结果在性别之间没有差异。接受CAS的无症状患者在围手术期MIs (F: 0-5.9% vs. M: 0.28-3.3%)、cva (F: 0.5-4.1% vs. M: 0.4-6.2%)和长期死亡率结局(F: 0-1.75% vs. M: 0.2- 1.5%)的发生率相似。有症状的接受CAS的患者同样报告了更高的围手术期MIs发生率(F: 0.3-7.1% vs. M: 0-5.5%)、cva (F: 0-9.9% vs. M: 0-7.6%)和长期死亡率(F: 0.6-7.1% vs. M: 0.5-8.2%)。大血管手术后结果的性别差异是公认的。我们的综述表明,有症状的女性在颈动脉介入治疗后神经系统和心脏事件的发生率更高,而无症状的患者则不然
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信