Factors Influencing the Perception and its Impact on Self-rated Health: A Cross-sectional Survey

Lami Singh, Bogireddy Sahithi, Hindustan Abdul Ahad, Bandaru Pavan Kumar, Vadde Madhusudhan
{"title":"Factors Influencing the Perception and its Impact on Self-rated Health: A Cross-sectional Survey","authors":"Lami Singh, Bogireddy Sahithi, Hindustan Abdul Ahad, Bandaru Pavan Kumar, Vadde Madhusudhan","doi":"10.25259/gjmpbu_146_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: A cross-sectional survey was made on self-rated health, which is a simple and easy-to-administer measure of general health. It is a valid and reliable measure among those without cognitive impairment. Initially, it replaced clinical assessments in survey research and clinical settings. Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional survey and the study was conducted in a community-based online survey of 6-month duration. Psychologically ill patients, pregnant women, and pediatrics were excluded from this study. The sample size was set to be >800, and the collected data were 806. The data was procured from every willing individual in the age group of 18-60 years old. To identify the similarity and variances in their responses, they were correlated with the health rating of the responders. The physicians at RDT Hospital, Bathalapalli, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh Prepared and validated the data collection form. Results: This study was evaluated to check the impact of health literacy on one’s health. All the factors were included and taken into consideration while framing the questionnaire. The parameters and the respondent’s answers were compared and correlated they were assessed by two-tailed test and significantly correlated using Pearson’s correlation. The self-rating of the health of the responders was found to be 47%. The major factors affecting health are age, gender, body mass index (BMI), occupation, weight profile, work profile, surrounding hygiene, quality of life, physical activity, eating habits, regular sleep cycle, sleep quality, stress factor, psychological and mental health, comorbidities, side effects, nutritional supplements, self-medication or doctor’s prescription, and literacy score. Respondent’s physical activities were collected and found to be 89.7% negative and statistically significant. The BMI of the responders was classified into four categories: Underweight (16.7%), normal (51.86%), overweight (20.09%), and obese (7.94%). It was found to be negatively significant and two-tailed correlated. Conclusion: The study has now provided evidence on what factors influence an individual’s health self-rating and how these factors correlate to influence each other on the same platform.","PeriodicalId":479818,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Medical Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Update","volume":"2018 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Medical Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/gjmpbu_146_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A cross-sectional survey was made on self-rated health, which is a simple and easy-to-administer measure of general health. It is a valid and reliable measure among those without cognitive impairment. Initially, it replaced clinical assessments in survey research and clinical settings. Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional survey and the study was conducted in a community-based online survey of 6-month duration. Psychologically ill patients, pregnant women, and pediatrics were excluded from this study. The sample size was set to be >800, and the collected data were 806. The data was procured from every willing individual in the age group of 18-60 years old. To identify the similarity and variances in their responses, they were correlated with the health rating of the responders. The physicians at RDT Hospital, Bathalapalli, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh Prepared and validated the data collection form. Results: This study was evaluated to check the impact of health literacy on one’s health. All the factors were included and taken into consideration while framing the questionnaire. The parameters and the respondent’s answers were compared and correlated they were assessed by two-tailed test and significantly correlated using Pearson’s correlation. The self-rating of the health of the responders was found to be 47%. The major factors affecting health are age, gender, body mass index (BMI), occupation, weight profile, work profile, surrounding hygiene, quality of life, physical activity, eating habits, regular sleep cycle, sleep quality, stress factor, psychological and mental health, comorbidities, side effects, nutritional supplements, self-medication or doctor’s prescription, and literacy score. Respondent’s physical activities were collected and found to be 89.7% negative and statistically significant. The BMI of the responders was classified into four categories: Underweight (16.7%), normal (51.86%), overweight (20.09%), and obese (7.94%). It was found to be negatively significant and two-tailed correlated. Conclusion: The study has now provided evidence on what factors influence an individual’s health self-rating and how these factors correlate to influence each other on the same platform.
影响感知的因素及其对自评健康的影响:一项横断面调查
目的:对自评健康进行横断面调查,自评健康是一种简单易行的一般健康测量方法。对于无认知障碍的患者,它是一种有效可靠的测量方法。最初,它在调查研究和临床环境中取代了临床评估。材料与方法:本研究为横断面调查,采用基于社区的在线调查,为期6个月。心理疾病患者、孕妇和儿科被排除在本研究之外。样本量设为>800,收集数据为806。这些数据是从18-60岁年龄组中每一个自愿参加的人那里获得的。为了确定他们的反应的相似性和差异,他们与响应者的健康评级相关。安得拉邦安纳塔普尔巴塔拉帕利RDT医院的医生编制并验证了数据收集表。结果:本研究评估健康素养对健康的影响。所有的因素都包括在内,并在制定问卷时加以考虑。参数和被调查者的答案进行比较和相关,他们通过双尾检验进行评估,并使用Pearson相关进行显着相关。应答者对健康的自我评价为47%。影响健康的主要因素是年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、职业、体重状况、工作状况、周围卫生、生活质量、身体活动、饮食习惯、规律睡眠周期、睡眠质量、压力因素、心理和精神健康、合并症、副作用、营养补充剂、自我用药或医生处方以及识字分数。收集被调查者的体育活动,发现89.7%为阴性,具有统计学意义。应答者的BMI分为体重过轻(16.7%)、正常(51.86%)、超重(20.09%)和肥胖(7.94%)4类。呈显著负相关,呈双尾相关。结论:这项研究现在已经为影响个人健康自我评价的因素以及这些因素如何在同一平台上相互影响提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信