What matters to LMOOC learners: content and sentiment analyses of learner course reviews

IF 6 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jun Lei, Qian Zhang
{"title":"What matters to LMOOC learners: content and sentiment analyses of learner course reviews","authors":"Jun Lei, Qian Zhang","doi":"10.1080/09588221.2023.2264875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article reports on the results of an investigation into what matters to learners of language Massive Open Online Courses (LMOOCs). The study conducted content and sentiment analyses of learner reviews of LMOOCs to investigate the key themes/subthemes in learner reviews and learners’ emotional tendencies in the themes/subthemes as well as differences in learners’ emotional tendencies detected in themes/subthemes. The dataset for this study included 8,671 learner reviews collected from 42 College English MOOCs hosted at a major MOOC platform in China. The content analysis identified four major themes—course, instructor, learning, and platform—and nine subthemes, revealing what learners were concerned about LMOOCs. The sentiment analysis detected both similarities and differences in learners’ emotional tendencies expressed in different themes/subthemes, showing that learners as a whole held overwhelmingly positive attitudes towards the LMOOCs but had grave concerns about curriculum design, instructors’ personal traits, and learning management system. These results yield a nuanced understanding of learners’ likes and dislikes about LMOOCs and provide important implications for enhancing the design, delivery, and development of LMOOCs.Keywords: Language Massive Open Online Courses (LMOOCs)content analysissentiment analysiscourse review AcknowledgementsThis study is part of a larger research project on computer-assisted language learning supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (23AYY023) and the Start-Up Research Grant of Ningbo University. We would like to thank Xinyu Fu for her assistance in data collection.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.","PeriodicalId":47787,"journal":{"name":"Computer Assisted Language Learning","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Assisted Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2264875","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis article reports on the results of an investigation into what matters to learners of language Massive Open Online Courses (LMOOCs). The study conducted content and sentiment analyses of learner reviews of LMOOCs to investigate the key themes/subthemes in learner reviews and learners’ emotional tendencies in the themes/subthemes as well as differences in learners’ emotional tendencies detected in themes/subthemes. The dataset for this study included 8,671 learner reviews collected from 42 College English MOOCs hosted at a major MOOC platform in China. The content analysis identified four major themes—course, instructor, learning, and platform—and nine subthemes, revealing what learners were concerned about LMOOCs. The sentiment analysis detected both similarities and differences in learners’ emotional tendencies expressed in different themes/subthemes, showing that learners as a whole held overwhelmingly positive attitudes towards the LMOOCs but had grave concerns about curriculum design, instructors’ personal traits, and learning management system. These results yield a nuanced understanding of learners’ likes and dislikes about LMOOCs and provide important implications for enhancing the design, delivery, and development of LMOOCs.Keywords: Language Massive Open Online Courses (LMOOCs)content analysissentiment analysiscourse review AcknowledgementsThis study is part of a larger research project on computer-assisted language learning supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (23AYY023) and the Start-Up Research Grant of Ningbo University. We would like to thank Xinyu Fu for her assistance in data collection.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
对LMOOC学习者来说重要的是:学习者课程评论的内容和情感分析
摘要本文报告了一项关于大规模在线开放课程(LMOOCs)学习者关注的问题的调查结果。本研究对LMOOCs学习者评论进行内容和情感分析,考察学习者评论中的关键主题/副主题、主题/副主题中学习者的情绪倾向,以及主题/副主题中学习者情绪倾向的差异。本研究的数据集包括8,671名学习者的评论,这些评论来自中国一家大型MOOC平台主办的42门大学英语MOOC课程。情绪分析发现,学习者在不同主题/副主题中表达的情绪倾向既有相似之处,也有差异,表明学习者总体上对LMOOCs持压倒性的积极态度,但对课程设计、教师个人特质和学习管理系统存在严重担忧。这些结果对学习者对LMOOCs的好恶有了细致的了解,并为加强LMOOCs的设计、交付和开发提供了重要的启示。本研究是国家社会科学基金(23AYY023)和宁波大学创业研究基金资助的计算机辅助语言学习大型研究项目的一部分。我们要感谢Xinyu Fu在数据收集方面的协助。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) is an intercontinental and interdisciplinary journal which leads the field in its dedication to all matters associated with the use of computers in language learning (L1 and L2), teaching and testing. It provides a forum to discuss the discoveries in the field and to exchange experience and information about existing techniques. The scope of the journal is intentionally wide-ranging and embraces a multitude of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信