PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR DAN TINGKAT KOLABORASI SISWA MENGGUNAKAN METODE DISKUSI ANTARA KELOMPOK HOMOGEN DENGAN KELOMPOK HETEROGEN

Wahyu Ningsih, Nyoto Suseno, M Barkah Salim
{"title":"PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR DAN TINGKAT KOLABORASI SISWA MENGGUNAKAN METODE DISKUSI ANTARA KELOMPOK HOMOGEN DENGAN KELOMPOK HETEROGEN","authors":"Wahyu Ningsih, Nyoto Suseno, M Barkah Salim","doi":"10.24127/firnas.v4i2.4423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The culture which applied to the education system in Indonesia is the grouping of students who tend to be heterogeneous. Many theories suggest that students whose learning using heterogeneous group discussion methods are better than homogeneous groups. However, there is also a claim that student who use learning methods of homogeneous group discussion is better than heterogeneous groups based on the Islamic educational system that refers to the homogeneous grouping of students. This study aims to determine the differences in learning result and the level of collaboration between homogeneous groups with heterogeneous groups and which groups are better. The kinds of this research is comparative with post-test only design. Sampling is done by purposive sampling. This research uses 2 (two) classes those are class VIII.1 consist of 27 students as homogeneous group and class VIII.2 consist of 31 students as heterogeneous group. The learning result data was taken by using test and collaboration using sheet observer. The results showed that the differences in learning result and levels of student collaboration between homogeneous groups with heterogeneous groups is 2,82 and 2,99. The result of study from homogeneous group is higher than heterogeneous group that is 73,91 equal to 61,06. The level of homogeneous group collaboration is higher than the heterogeneous group that is 66.20 equal to 57.74.","PeriodicalId":476924,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL FIRNAS","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL FIRNAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24127/firnas.v4i2.4423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The culture which applied to the education system in Indonesia is the grouping of students who tend to be heterogeneous. Many theories suggest that students whose learning using heterogeneous group discussion methods are better than homogeneous groups. However, there is also a claim that student who use learning methods of homogeneous group discussion is better than heterogeneous groups based on the Islamic educational system that refers to the homogeneous grouping of students. This study aims to determine the differences in learning result and the level of collaboration between homogeneous groups with heterogeneous groups and which groups are better. The kinds of this research is comparative with post-test only design. Sampling is done by purposive sampling. This research uses 2 (two) classes those are class VIII.1 consist of 27 students as homogeneous group and class VIII.2 consist of 31 students as heterogeneous group. The learning result data was taken by using test and collaboration using sheet observer. The results showed that the differences in learning result and levels of student collaboration between homogeneous groups with heterogeneous groups is 2,82 and 2,99. The result of study from homogeneous group is higher than heterogeneous group that is 73,91 equal to 61,06. The level of homogeneous group collaboration is higher than the heterogeneous group that is 66.20 equal to 57.74.
比较学习结果和学生协作使用同质群体和异质群体之间的讨论方法
适用于印度尼西亚教育系统的文化是学生群体往往是异质的。许多理论表明,使用异质小组讨论方法学习的学生比使用同质小组讨论方法学习的学生更好。然而,也有一种说法认为,使用同质小组讨论的学习方法的学生比基于伊斯兰教育系统的异质小组的学生更好,伊斯兰教育系统指的是同质小组的学生。本研究旨在确定同质组和异质组在学习效果和协作水平上的差异,以及哪个组更好。本研究的种类与后验设计相比较。抽样是有目的抽样。本研究使用2(2)个班,分别是:第VIII.1班27名学生为同质组,第VIII.2班31名学生为异质组。学习结果数据的采集采用测试法,并采用纸片观测器进行协作。结果表明,同质组与异质组在学习效果和学生合作水平上的差异分别为2.82和2.99。同质组的研究结果高于异质组(73,91 = 61,06)。同质组协作水平高于异质组(66.20 = 57.74)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信