Assessing phase reconstruction accuracy for different nonlinear curvature wavefront sensor configurations

IF 1.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Letchev, Stanimir, Crass, Jonathan, Crepp, Justin R.
{"title":"Assessing phase reconstruction accuracy for different nonlinear curvature wavefront sensor configurations","authors":"Letchev, Stanimir, Crass, Jonathan, Crepp, Justin R.","doi":"10.1117/1.jatis.9.4.049001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nonlinear curvature wavefront sensor (nlCWFS) offers improved sensitivity for adaptive optics (AO) systems compared to existing wavefront sensors, such as the Shack-Hartmann. The nominal nlCWFS design uses a series of imaging planes offset from the pupil along the optical propagation axis as inputs to a numerically-iterative reconstruction algorithm. Research into the nlCWFS has assumed that the device uses four measurement planes configured symmetrically around the optical system pupil. This assumption is not strictly required. In this paper, we perform the first systematic exploration of the location, number, and spatial sampling of measurement planes for the nlCWFS. Our numerical simulations show that the original, symmetric four-plane configuration produces the most consistently accurate results in the shortest time over a broad range of seeing conditions. We find that the inner measurement planes should be situated past the Talbot distance corresponding to a spatial period of $r_0$. The outer planes should be large enough to fully capture field intensity and be situated beyond a distance corresponding to a Fresnel-number-scaled equivalent of $Z\\approx50$ km for a $D=0.5$ m pupil with $\\lambda=532$ nm. The minimum spatial sampling required for diffraction-limited performance is 4-5 pixels per $r_0$ as defined in the pupil plane. We find that neither three-plane nor five-plane configurations offer significant improvements compared to the original design. These results can impact future implementations of the nlCWFS by informing sensor design.","PeriodicalId":54342,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jatis.9.4.049001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nonlinear curvature wavefront sensor (nlCWFS) offers improved sensitivity for adaptive optics (AO) systems compared to existing wavefront sensors, such as the Shack-Hartmann. The nominal nlCWFS design uses a series of imaging planes offset from the pupil along the optical propagation axis as inputs to a numerically-iterative reconstruction algorithm. Research into the nlCWFS has assumed that the device uses four measurement planes configured symmetrically around the optical system pupil. This assumption is not strictly required. In this paper, we perform the first systematic exploration of the location, number, and spatial sampling of measurement planes for the nlCWFS. Our numerical simulations show that the original, symmetric four-plane configuration produces the most consistently accurate results in the shortest time over a broad range of seeing conditions. We find that the inner measurement planes should be situated past the Talbot distance corresponding to a spatial period of $r_0$. The outer planes should be large enough to fully capture field intensity and be situated beyond a distance corresponding to a Fresnel-number-scaled equivalent of $Z\approx50$ km for a $D=0.5$ m pupil with $\lambda=532$ nm. The minimum spatial sampling required for diffraction-limited performance is 4-5 pixels per $r_0$ as defined in the pupil plane. We find that neither three-plane nor five-plane configurations offer significant improvements compared to the original design. These results can impact future implementations of the nlCWFS by informing sensor design.
评估不同非线性曲率波前传感器配置的相位重建精度
与现有的波前传感器(如Shack-Hartmann)相比,非线性曲率波前传感器(nlCWFS)为自适应光学(AO)系统提供了更高的灵敏度。标称nlCWFS设计使用一系列的成像平面从瞳孔偏移沿光学传播轴作为输入到一个数值迭代重建算法。对nlCWFS的研究假设该设备使用四个测量平面对称地配置在光学系统瞳孔周围。这个假设并不是严格要求的。本文首次对nlCWFS测量平面的位置、数量和空间采样进行了系统的探索。我们的数值模拟表明,在广泛的视觉条件下,原始的对称四平面配置在最短的时间内产生最一致的精确结果。我们发现内部测量平面应该位于塔尔博特距离之后,对应于$r_0$的空间周期。外平面应该足够大,以充分捕捉场强,并且位于菲涅耳数刻度的距离之外,对应于$D=0.5$ m瞳孔和$\lambda=532$ nm瞳孔的距离为$Z\approx50$ km。衍射限制性能所需的最小空间采样是在瞳孔平面中定义的4-5像素/ $r_0$。我们发现,与原始设计相比,三平面和五平面配置都没有显着改进。这些结果可以通过为传感器设计提供信息来影响nlCWFS的未来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems publishes peer-reviewed papers reporting on original research in the development, testing, and application of telescopes, instrumentation, techniques, and systems for ground- and space-based astronomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信