Investigating the correlation between morphological features of microplastics (5–500 µm) and their analytical recovery

O. Hagelskjær, A. Crézé, G. Le Roux, J. E. Sonke
{"title":"Investigating the correlation between morphological features of microplastics (5–500 µm) and their analytical recovery","authors":"O. Hagelskjær, A. Crézé, G. Le Roux, J. E. Sonke","doi":"10.1186/s43591-023-00071-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As a direct result of laboratory sample manipulation required to identify microplastics (MPs) within a given matrix, some MPs are inevitably lost. The extent of this loss can be quite significant and varies greatly depending on the sample matrix, choice of protocol and target MPs in question. Defining analytical MP recovery is therefore a critical component in ensuring the quality of MP protocols. The potential relationship between particle size and recovery rate has been widely discussed but remains uncertain. To determine whether MP loss correlated with particle size, three aliquots of polyethylene fragments in the 5–50 µm size range and three aliquots of polypropylene fragments in the 50–500 µm size range, were consecutively transferred back and forth from filter to liquid. After each individual transfer the analytical recovery within specified size groups, was evaluated by applying high-resolution darkfield microscopy. Average recovery across the entire size range was estimated at 80% with a standard deviation (std. dev.) of 26%. Notably, particle coverage on filters (A%) showed a more significant impact on recovery than particle size. Maintaining A% below 5% on filters for microscopic analysis is advised to prevent excessive loss due to particle agglomeration. To determine whether the use of red polyethylene fragments in the 5–50 µm size range in combination with darkfield microscopy could potentially improve MP recovery evaluation in environmental samples, three aliquots of 0.5 g of dry brown trout muscle tissue were spiked and treated according to a relevant protocol. This size-discriminating approach accurately determined average recovery at 52% with a std. dev. of 4% and demonstrated the potential for correction of the concentration enhancement of smaller MPs resulting from particle breakup during sample pre-treatment, which would otherwise lead to overestimation of smaller size fractions.","PeriodicalId":74190,"journal":{"name":"Microplastics and nanoplastics","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microplastics and nanoplastics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-023-00071-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract As a direct result of laboratory sample manipulation required to identify microplastics (MPs) within a given matrix, some MPs are inevitably lost. The extent of this loss can be quite significant and varies greatly depending on the sample matrix, choice of protocol and target MPs in question. Defining analytical MP recovery is therefore a critical component in ensuring the quality of MP protocols. The potential relationship between particle size and recovery rate has been widely discussed but remains uncertain. To determine whether MP loss correlated with particle size, three aliquots of polyethylene fragments in the 5–50 µm size range and three aliquots of polypropylene fragments in the 50–500 µm size range, were consecutively transferred back and forth from filter to liquid. After each individual transfer the analytical recovery within specified size groups, was evaluated by applying high-resolution darkfield microscopy. Average recovery across the entire size range was estimated at 80% with a standard deviation (std. dev.) of 26%. Notably, particle coverage on filters (A%) showed a more significant impact on recovery than particle size. Maintaining A% below 5% on filters for microscopic analysis is advised to prevent excessive loss due to particle agglomeration. To determine whether the use of red polyethylene fragments in the 5–50 µm size range in combination with darkfield microscopy could potentially improve MP recovery evaluation in environmental samples, three aliquots of 0.5 g of dry brown trout muscle tissue were spiked and treated according to a relevant protocol. This size-discriminating approach accurately determined average recovery at 52% with a std. dev. of 4% and demonstrated the potential for correction of the concentration enhancement of smaller MPs resulting from particle breakup during sample pre-treatment, which would otherwise lead to overestimation of smaller size fractions.
研究微塑料(5-500µm)的形态特征与其分析回收率之间的关系
作为在给定基质中识别微塑料(MPs)所需的实验室样品操作的直接结果,一些MPs不可避免地会丢失。这种损失的程度可能相当显著,并且根据样本矩阵、协议选择和所讨论的目标MPs而有很大差异。因此,定义分析MP回收是确保MP协议质量的关键组成部分。粒径与回收率之间的潜在关系已被广泛讨论,但仍不确定。为了确定MP损失是否与粒径相关,将3等分5-50µm粒径范围内的聚乙烯碎片和3等分50-500µm粒径范围内的聚丙烯碎片连续从过滤器来回转移到液体中。在每个个体转移后,在指定大小组内的分析回收率,通过应用高分辨率暗场显微镜进行评估。整个尺寸范围内的平均采收率估计为80%,标准偏差(std. dev)为26%。值得注意的是,过滤器上的颗粒覆盖率(A%)比颗粒大小对回收率的影响更显著。建议将过滤器的A%维持在5%以下,以进行微观分析,以防止由于颗粒团聚而造成的过度损失。为了确定5-50µm尺寸范围内的红聚乙烯碎片与暗场显微镜相结合是否可以潜在地提高环境样品中MP的回收率评估,我们添加了三份0.5 g干褐鳟肌肉组织,并根据相关方案进行处理。这种粒度判别方法准确地确定了平均回收率为52%,标准偏差为4%,并证明了校正样品预处理过程中颗粒破碎导致的较小MPs浓度增强的潜力,否则会导致对较小粒径组分的高估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信