Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Bystander strategies

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
V. L. Nazarov, N. V. Averbuch
{"title":"Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Bystander strategies","authors":"V. L. Nazarov, N. V. Averbuch","doi":"10.17853/1994-5639-2023-9-80-117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. An important aspect of any bullying is the position of the bystander. Timely intervention by a bystander can prevent bullying or mitigate its consequences for the victim. On the other hand, the bystander may join the bullying on the aggressor’s side or maintain a neutral position, which will cause the aggressor to feel impunity and increase the victimisation of the bullying object. This study compares the actions of bystanders of traditional school bullying, school cyberbullying and nonschool cyberbullying. Aim. The current study aims to define the strategy of school bullying and cyberbullying bystanders and clarify the most frequently observed forms of bullying by bystanders. Methodology and research methods. To study the problem, a questionnaire was developed designed to study the forms of bullying and witness behaviour strategies. The questionnaire survey was conducted among 1,762 middle-level students of educational organisations of general secondary education and secondary vocational training in Ekaterinburg and the Sverdlovsk Region. Results . Among the bystanders of traditional bullying, 39% prefer non-interference, 36% prefer to support the victim, 23% report bullying to parents and teachers, 0.7% join the aggressor and 1% gave the answer “other”. Among the bystanders of school cyberbullying, 44.5% prefer non-interference, 24.5% support the victim, 28% inform parents, teachers or the administration of an Internet resource, 0.5% join the harassment and 1.5% gave the answer “other”. Among the bystanders of non-school cyberbullying, 42.5% prefer non-interference, 25.5% support the victim, 29.5% inform parents, teachers or the administration of an Internet resource, 1% join the harassment and 1% gave the answer “other”. As can be seen, the percentage of those who prefer non-interference is highest among the bystanders of school cyberbullying, while the percentage of bystanders who support the victim is highest among the bystanders of traditional bullying. The percentage of those joining the bullying on the side of the persecutor is highest among the bystanders of non-school cyberbullying. Scientific novelty . In this study, for the first time, the categories of bystanders of school and nonschool cyberbullying are divided as categories of bystanders of various processes. Among the possible strategies of behaviour of a bystander in a situation of bullying, for the first time, it is proposed to seek help from adults or from the administration of the Internet resource on the basis of which the bullying takes place. Practical significance. Based on the study of the behaviour of the bystander of bullying (traditional bullying and cyberbullying), the results of this work could be applied to develop recommendations for encouraging the bystander to intervene in bullying on the victim’s side, to stop it independently or to inform teachers.","PeriodicalId":44143,"journal":{"name":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","volume":"106 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-9-80-117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. An important aspect of any bullying is the position of the bystander. Timely intervention by a bystander can prevent bullying or mitigate its consequences for the victim. On the other hand, the bystander may join the bullying on the aggressor’s side or maintain a neutral position, which will cause the aggressor to feel impunity and increase the victimisation of the bullying object. This study compares the actions of bystanders of traditional school bullying, school cyberbullying and nonschool cyberbullying. Aim. The current study aims to define the strategy of school bullying and cyberbullying bystanders and clarify the most frequently observed forms of bullying by bystanders. Methodology and research methods. To study the problem, a questionnaire was developed designed to study the forms of bullying and witness behaviour strategies. The questionnaire survey was conducted among 1,762 middle-level students of educational organisations of general secondary education and secondary vocational training in Ekaterinburg and the Sverdlovsk Region. Results . Among the bystanders of traditional bullying, 39% prefer non-interference, 36% prefer to support the victim, 23% report bullying to parents and teachers, 0.7% join the aggressor and 1% gave the answer “other”. Among the bystanders of school cyberbullying, 44.5% prefer non-interference, 24.5% support the victim, 28% inform parents, teachers or the administration of an Internet resource, 0.5% join the harassment and 1.5% gave the answer “other”. Among the bystanders of non-school cyberbullying, 42.5% prefer non-interference, 25.5% support the victim, 29.5% inform parents, teachers or the administration of an Internet resource, 1% join the harassment and 1% gave the answer “other”. As can be seen, the percentage of those who prefer non-interference is highest among the bystanders of school cyberbullying, while the percentage of bystanders who support the victim is highest among the bystanders of traditional bullying. The percentage of those joining the bullying on the side of the persecutor is highest among the bystanders of non-school cyberbullying. Scientific novelty . In this study, for the first time, the categories of bystanders of school and nonschool cyberbullying are divided as categories of bystanders of various processes. Among the possible strategies of behaviour of a bystander in a situation of bullying, for the first time, it is proposed to seek help from adults or from the administration of the Internet resource on the basis of which the bullying takes place. Practical significance. Based on the study of the behaviour of the bystander of bullying (traditional bullying and cyberbullying), the results of this work could be applied to develop recommendations for encouraging the bystander to intervene in bullying on the victim’s side, to stop it independently or to inform teachers.
传统欺凌与网络欺凌:旁观者策略
介绍。任何欺凌行为的一个重要方面是旁观者的位置。旁观者的及时干预可以防止欺凌或减轻其对受害者的后果。另一方面,旁观者可能站在攻击者一方加入欺凌行为,或保持中立,这会使攻击者感到有罪不罚,从而增加被欺凌对象的受害程度。本研究比较了传统校园欺凌、校园网络欺凌和非校园网络欺凌的旁观者行为。的目标。本研究旨在界定校园欺凌和网络欺凌旁观者的策略,并澄清旁观者最常观察到的欺凌形式。方法论和研究方法。为了研究这个问题,我们开发了一份调查问卷,旨在研究欺凌的形式和目击者的行为策略。问卷调查是在叶卡捷琳堡和斯维尔德洛夫斯克地区普通中等教育和中等职业培训教育机构的1762名中级学生中进行的。结果。在传统霸凌的旁观者中,39%的人选择不干涉,36%的人选择支持受害者,23%的人向父母和老师报告霸凌,0.7%的人选择加入施暴者,1%的人选择“其他”。在学校网络欺凌的旁观者中,44.5%的人选择不干涉,24.5%的人支持受害者,28%的人通知家长、老师或网络资源管理部门,0.5%的人加入骚扰,1.5%的人选择“其他”。在非学校网络欺凌的旁观者中,42.5%的人选择不干涉,25.5%的人支持受害者,29.5%的人通知父母、老师或网络资源管理部门,1%的人加入骚扰,1%的人回答“其他”。可以看出,在学校网络欺凌的旁观者中,支持受害者的比例最高,而在传统欺凌的旁观者中,支持受害者的比例最高。在非学校网络欺凌的旁观者中,站在施暴者一边参与欺凌的比例最高。科学的新奇。本研究首次将学校和非学校网络欺凌的旁观者类别划分为不同过程的旁观者类别。在欺凌情境下旁观者可能的行为策略中,首次提出向成年人寻求帮助或向欺凌发生的网络资源管理部门寻求帮助。现实意义。基于对欺凌旁观者(传统欺凌和网络欺凌)行为的研究,这项工作的结果可以应用于制定建议,以鼓励旁观者干预受害者一方的欺凌行为,独立制止欺凌行为或告知教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science
Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
42.90%
发文量
56
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信