Questioning Assumptions About Developing an Andragogy Study Program in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Amina Isanović Hadžiomerović
{"title":"Questioning Assumptions About Developing an Andragogy Study Program in Bosnia and Herzegovina","authors":"Amina Isanović Hadžiomerović","doi":"10.4312/as/13507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses how the key actors involved (university professors, policy makers, and practitioners) perceive the need for launching an andragogy study program in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). Drawing on the social field concept, the central argument posits that the perceptions of the three groups are shaped by their respective positions and interests concerning adult learning and education (ALE). The research methodology includes an analysis of university curricula and qualitative surveys based on the model of the problem-centred interview (PCI). The results show inter-group differences and intra-group congruence. University professors support the idea of launching an independent andragogy study program but have different visions of the implementation model. Policy makers and practitioners show less awareness of the need for such a program and for different reasons. The practitioners’ opinion is that the relevant competencies can be obtained through non-formal or work-based learning, while policy makers cite lower interest in studying social sciences.","PeriodicalId":31462,"journal":{"name":"AS Andragoska Spoznanja","volume":"27 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AS Andragoska Spoznanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/as/13507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses how the key actors involved (university professors, policy makers, and practitioners) perceive the need for launching an andragogy study program in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). Drawing on the social field concept, the central argument posits that the perceptions of the three groups are shaped by their respective positions and interests concerning adult learning and education (ALE). The research methodology includes an analysis of university curricula and qualitative surveys based on the model of the problem-centred interview (PCI). The results show inter-group differences and intra-group congruence. University professors support the idea of launching an independent andragogy study program but have different visions of the implementation model. Policy makers and practitioners show less awareness of the need for such a program and for different reasons. The practitioners’ opinion is that the relevant competencies can be obtained through non-formal or work-based learning, while policy makers cite lower interest in studying social sciences.
质疑关于在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那发展性学研究项目的假设
本文分析了主要参与者(大学教授、政策制定者和实践者)如何认识到在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那(波黑)开展性学研究项目的必要性。借鉴社会领域概念,中心论点认为,这三个群体的看法是由他们各自在成人学习和教育(ALE)方面的立场和利益所塑造的。研究方法包括对大学课程的分析和基于问题中心访谈(PCI)模型的定性调查。结果显示组间差异和组内一致性。大学教授们支持开展独立的性学研究项目,但对实施模式有不同的看法。由于不同的原因,政策制定者和实践者对这样一个项目的必要性认识不足。实践者的观点是,相关的能力可以通过非正式的或基于工作的学习获得,而政策制定者则表示对学习社会科学的兴趣较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信