Evaluating treatment solutions: Critical review on technologies employed for microplastic removal from water matrices

IF 6.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Almeenu Rasheed , Neha Sharma , Rao Y. Surampalli , Sovik Das
{"title":"Evaluating treatment solutions: Critical review on technologies employed for microplastic removal from water matrices","authors":"Almeenu Rasheed ,&nbsp;Neha Sharma ,&nbsp;Rao Y. Surampalli ,&nbsp;Sovik Das","doi":"10.1016/j.coesh.2023.100516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The emerging environmental concerns and the subsequent surge in microplastic (MP) research can be linked to their extensive presence and the subsequent adverse impact on the ecosystem, necessitating the identification of efficacious, environmentally conscious and economically feasible MP mitigating </span>technologies<span>. In this veneration, different technological approaches are compared based on removal efficiencies, environmental impacts and economic feasibility. Critical comparison of existing technologies by using life cycle assessment, techno-economic and strength-weakness-opportunity-threat analysis showed that the chemical methods exhibit better removal efficiencies, whereas the hybrid methods exhibited better environmental and economic feasibility. The secondary pollution caused by the existing physical and biological treatment methods is also highlighted along with the focus on the need for further research in developing sustainable and efficient MP removal technology.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":52296,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100516"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584423000764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emerging environmental concerns and the subsequent surge in microplastic (MP) research can be linked to their extensive presence and the subsequent adverse impact on the ecosystem, necessitating the identification of efficacious, environmentally conscious and economically feasible MP mitigating technologies. In this veneration, different technological approaches are compared based on removal efficiencies, environmental impacts and economic feasibility. Critical comparison of existing technologies by using life cycle assessment, techno-economic and strength-weakness-opportunity-threat analysis showed that the chemical methods exhibit better removal efficiencies, whereas the hybrid methods exhibited better environmental and economic feasibility. The secondary pollution caused by the existing physical and biological treatment methods is also highlighted along with the focus on the need for further research in developing sustainable and efficient MP removal technology.

Abstract Image

评价处理方案:从水基质中去除微塑料的关键技术综述
新出现的环境问题和随后的微塑料(MP)研究激增可能与它们的广泛存在及其对生态系统的不利影响有关,因此有必要确定有效、环保和经济上可行的MP缓解技术。在此基础上,根据去除效率、环境影响和经济可行性对不同的技术方法进行了比较。通过生命周期评价、技术经济和优势-劣势-机会-威胁分析对现有技术进行了关键性比较,结果表明化学方法具有更好的去除效率,而混合方法具有更好的环境和经济可行性。强调了现有物理和生物处理方法造成的二次污染,并强调需要进一步研究开发可持续和高效的MP去除技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health
Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
114 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信