Ludobójstwo, zbrodnia, pogrom, rzeź, masakra, makabra... Obrazy kognitywne zakodowane w semantycznej strukturze synonimów określających okrucieństwa wobec grup etnicznych

Dorota Zdunkiewicz-Jedynak
{"title":"Ludobójstwo, zbrodnia, pogrom, rzeź, masakra, makabra... Obrazy kognitywne zakodowane w semantycznej strukturze synonimów określających okrucieństwa wobec grup etnicznych","authors":"Dorota Zdunkiewicz-Jedynak","doi":"10.25167/stylistyka31.2022.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to show the cognitive images encoded in the semantic structure of the lexemes: war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, slaughter, pogrom, massacre, and macabre, used to describe atrocities against ethnic groups. The analysiswas based on the example of the material related to the Ukrainian citizens during the war, which has been ongoing since 24 February 2022. The analysis is rooted in the theoretical framework of cognitive ethnolinguistics, including the profiling method, which is quite innovative in linguistics. The article proves that the lexemes under consideration, although of similar cognitive value, differ in terms of the ordering of the components of meaning, which makes them evoke a different image in thereader of the texts. Five different perspectives of the perception of war atrocities encoded in the words are distinguished, i.e., (1) the moral and penal aspect; (2) the collective subject of the actions and the minority nature of the victims; (3) the modus operandi of the perpetrator; (4) the totality of the destruction evident to the observer; and (5) the emotions that the effect of the perpetrator’s actions evokes in the witness, i.e., horror and disgust.","PeriodicalId":472186,"journal":{"name":"Stylistyka","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stylistyka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25167/stylistyka31.2022.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to show the cognitive images encoded in the semantic structure of the lexemes: war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, slaughter, pogrom, massacre, and macabre, used to describe atrocities against ethnic groups. The analysiswas based on the example of the material related to the Ukrainian citizens during the war, which has been ongoing since 24 February 2022. The analysis is rooted in the theoretical framework of cognitive ethnolinguistics, including the profiling method, which is quite innovative in linguistics. The article proves that the lexemes under consideration, although of similar cognitive value, differ in terms of the ordering of the components of meaning, which makes them evoke a different image in thereader of the texts. Five different perspectives of the perception of war atrocities encoded in the words are distinguished, i.e., (1) the moral and penal aspect; (2) the collective subject of the actions and the minority nature of the victims; (3) the modus operandi of the perpetrator; (4) the totality of the destruction evident to the observer; and (5) the emotions that the effect of the perpetrator’s actions evokes in the witness, i.e., horror and disgust.
种族灭绝、犯罪、大屠杀、屠杀、恐怖......表示对种族群体暴行的同义词语义结构中编码的认知图像
这篇文章的目的是展示在词素语义结构中编码的认知图像:战争罪、反人类罪、种族灭绝、屠杀、大屠杀和恐怖,用于描述对种族群体的暴行。分析是基于自2022年2月24日以来一直在进行的战争期间与乌克兰公民有关的材料的例子。这一分析植根于认知民族语言学的理论框架,其中包括语言学上颇具创新意义的剖析方法。本文论证了所研究的词汇虽然具有相似的认知价值,但在意义组成部分的顺序上存在差异,这使得它们在文本的读者中引起不同的印象。从五个不同的角度对战争暴行的看法进行了区分,即:(1)道德和惩罚方面;(二)行为的集体主体和被害人的少数人性质;(三)犯罪手法;(四)肉眼可见的全部破坏情况;(5)加害人行为的影响在证人中引起的情绪,即恐怖和厌恶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信