A FAZENDA PÚBLICA EM JUÍZO: UM ADEUS AOS PRAZOS EM DOBRO?

MANOEL MATIAS MEDEIROS DE ARAÚJO
{"title":"A FAZENDA PÚBLICA EM JUÍZO: UM ADEUS AOS PRAZOS EM DOBRO?","authors":"MANOEL MATIAS MEDEIROS DE ARAÚJO","doi":"10.35265/2236-6717-238-12742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to analyze the double procedural deadlines granted to the Public Treasury and demonstrate why this prerogative is currently inadequate. Therefore, this work used bibliographic and qualitative research on the doctrine, legislation and jurisprudence related to the subject, as well as quantitative research on statistical data from the National Council of Justice. Currently, given the computerization of institutions and the ease with which personal data can be found, the reasons why procedural deadlines were doubled have disappeared. In addition, there is a great concern with the balance of the civil procedure, making a more accentuated analysis of this scenario of disparities essential.","PeriodicalId":21289,"journal":{"name":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-238-12742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the double procedural deadlines granted to the Public Treasury and demonstrate why this prerogative is currently inadequate. Therefore, this work used bibliographic and qualitative research on the doctrine, legislation and jurisprudence related to the subject, as well as quantitative research on statistical data from the National Council of Justice. Currently, given the computerization of institutions and the ease with which personal data can be found, the reasons why procedural deadlines were doubled have disappeared. In addition, there is a great concern with the balance of the civil procedure, making a more accentuated analysis of this scenario of disparities essential.
公共财政在法庭上:告别双重期限?
本文旨在分析授予国库的双重程序最后期限,并说明为什么这一特权目前是不充分的。因此,这项工作对与该主题有关的学说、立法和法理学进行了书目和定性研究,并对国家司法委员会的统计数据进行了定量研究。目前,由于各机构已电脑化,个人资料也很容易找到,因此将程序截止日期延长一倍的原因已不复存在。此外,人们对民事诉讼程序的平衡十分关切,因此必须对这种差异情况进行更深入的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信