‘And suddenly it’s not so flexible anymore!’ Discursive effects in comments from school leaders and staff about distance education

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Johanna Mufic
{"title":"‘And suddenly it’s not so flexible anymore!’ Discursive effects in comments from school leaders and staff about distance education","authors":"Johanna Mufic","doi":"10.1080/02660830.2023.2249141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distance education has received a lot of attention in contemporary policy as something that makes it possible for more students to participate, but also involves a certain set of challenges. When it comes to distance education, Swedish municipal adult education (MAE) stands out with its long history of flexible education, often provided on distance. Applying Bacchi’s poststructural WPR approach, the aim of this study was to scrutinise how distance education is construed, and the discursive effects of this, in comments by MAE school leaders and staff during a quality audit. The analysis shows that it becomes difficult to question or think differently about distance education within the flexibility discourse in adult education. Moreover, the blame for students’ lack of goal attainment and increased dropouts seems to be put on external providers, municipalities, and the students rather than on the way that the adult education system is organised or the demands around flexibility in adult education policy. What seems to be left out is a discussion about the pedagogical and didactical implications of distance education.","PeriodicalId":42210,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2023.2249141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distance education has received a lot of attention in contemporary policy as something that makes it possible for more students to participate, but also involves a certain set of challenges. When it comes to distance education, Swedish municipal adult education (MAE) stands out with its long history of flexible education, often provided on distance. Applying Bacchi’s poststructural WPR approach, the aim of this study was to scrutinise how distance education is construed, and the discursive effects of this, in comments by MAE school leaders and staff during a quality audit. The analysis shows that it becomes difficult to question or think differently about distance education within the flexibility discourse in adult education. Moreover, the blame for students’ lack of goal attainment and increased dropouts seems to be put on external providers, municipalities, and the students rather than on the way that the adult education system is organised or the demands around flexibility in adult education policy. What seems to be left out is a discussion about the pedagogical and didactical implications of distance education.
“突然间,它就不那么灵活了!”学校领导和教职工对远程教育评价的话语效应
远程教育在当代政策中受到了很多关注,因为它可以让更多的学生参与进来,但也涉及到一些挑战。谈到远程教育,瑞典市政成人教育(MAE)以其灵活的教育历史而脱颖而出,这种教育通常是远程提供的。应用Bacchi的后结构WPR方法,本研究的目的是仔细检查远程教育是如何被解释的,以及在质量审计期间MAE学校领导和工作人员的评论中,远程教育的话语效应。分析表明,在成人教育的灵活性话语中,很难对远程教育提出质疑或进行不同的思考。此外,学生缺乏目标实现和辍学率上升的责任似乎被归咎于外部提供者、市政当局和学生,而不是成人教育系统的组织方式或对成人教育政策灵活性的要求。似乎被遗漏的是关于远程教育的教学和教学意义的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE
Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信