The EU Trust Fund for Colombia: Valuable lessons for hybrid peacebuilding

IF 2 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Carlos Madridejos Ornilla
{"title":"The EU Trust Fund for Colombia: Valuable lessons for hybrid peacebuilding","authors":"Carlos Madridejos Ornilla","doi":"10.1111/dpr.12753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Motivation</h3>\n \n <p>The European Union (EU) Trust Fund has supported the implementation of the 2016 Peace Agreement in Colombia. It represents innovative funding that goes beyond the classic parameters of the so-called “liberal peace”—that is, imposing a standard formula of guaranteeing security and public order, promoting electoral processes through a party system, and fostering economic openness and free markets.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>We analyse the planning, financing, and operational mechanisms of the Trust Fund to identify those elements that encourage or constrain co-operation for peacebuilding; elements able to integrate and complement the agendas, actors, and dynamics at international, national, and local levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and approach</h3>\n \n <p>The article is based on the ongoing support of the Trust Fund for over four years, including an extensive documentary review, participation in numerous events and meetings, and making more than ten field visits to the Fund's intervention areas. More than 50 interviews were conducted with ex-combatants, local leaders, and representatives of the EU, public institutions, and civil society organizations (CSOs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The Trust Fund has tried to build peace at local and territorial levels. It has proved an assertive and pluralistic instrument, innovating in inter-institutional co-ordination, political dialogue, and articulation at the local level. This has not only been visible strategically, but also technically by developing innovations with a high potential for adaptation or scaling up; for example, public access to project progress indicators, the widespread use of third-party funding to distribute resources to the weakest or most isolated CSOs, and inclusion of the territorial approach in project design and intervention logic.</p>\n \n <p>The Fund has been limited, however, by a context in which peacebuilding initiatives have tended to come from central government and donors, rather than from local actors. The government (of President Duque) was reluctant to implement the entirety of its commitments to peace: the EU Delegation was equally reluctant to challenge the government over this.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\n \n <p>The experience of the EU Trust Fund in Colombia can provide valuable ideas to support peace processes elsewhere, to enrich the EU's position and approach to managing and resolving armed conflicts. New instruments, such as the “Team Europe Initiatives” or the “Neighbourhood, Development and International Co-operation instrument – Global Europe,” focused on multi-stakeholder co-ordination and international partnerships, can benefit significantly from lessons learned in Colombia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51478,"journal":{"name":"Development Policy Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.12753","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivation

The European Union (EU) Trust Fund has supported the implementation of the 2016 Peace Agreement in Colombia. It represents innovative funding that goes beyond the classic parameters of the so-called “liberal peace”—that is, imposing a standard formula of guaranteeing security and public order, promoting electoral processes through a party system, and fostering economic openness and free markets.

Purpose

We analyse the planning, financing, and operational mechanisms of the Trust Fund to identify those elements that encourage or constrain co-operation for peacebuilding; elements able to integrate and complement the agendas, actors, and dynamics at international, national, and local levels.

Methods and approach

The article is based on the ongoing support of the Trust Fund for over four years, including an extensive documentary review, participation in numerous events and meetings, and making more than ten field visits to the Fund's intervention areas. More than 50 interviews were conducted with ex-combatants, local leaders, and representatives of the EU, public institutions, and civil society organizations (CSOs).

Findings

The Trust Fund has tried to build peace at local and territorial levels. It has proved an assertive and pluralistic instrument, innovating in inter-institutional co-ordination, political dialogue, and articulation at the local level. This has not only been visible strategically, but also technically by developing innovations with a high potential for adaptation or scaling up; for example, public access to project progress indicators, the widespread use of third-party funding to distribute resources to the weakest or most isolated CSOs, and inclusion of the territorial approach in project design and intervention logic.

The Fund has been limited, however, by a context in which peacebuilding initiatives have tended to come from central government and donors, rather than from local actors. The government (of President Duque) was reluctant to implement the entirety of its commitments to peace: the EU Delegation was equally reluctant to challenge the government over this.

Policy implications

The experience of the EU Trust Fund in Colombia can provide valuable ideas to support peace processes elsewhere, to enrich the EU's position and approach to managing and resolving armed conflicts. New instruments, such as the “Team Europe Initiatives” or the “Neighbourhood, Development and International Co-operation instrument – Global Europe,” focused on multi-stakeholder co-ordination and international partnerships, can benefit significantly from lessons learned in Colombia.

欧盟哥伦比亚信托基金:混合建设和平的宝贵经验
动机 欧洲联盟(欧盟)信托基金为哥伦比亚 2016 年和平协议的实施提供了支持。它代表了创新性的资助,超越了所谓 "自由和平 "的传统参数,即实施保障安全和公共秩序、通过政党制度促进选举进程以及促进经济开放和自由市场的标准模式。 目的 我们分析了信托基金的规划、筹资和运作机制,以确定那些鼓励或限制建设和平合作的因素;那些能够整合和补充国际、国家和地方各级的议程、参与者和动态的因素。 方法 本文基于信托基金四年多来的持续支持,包括广泛的文件审查、参加大量活动和会议,以及对基金干预地区进行十余次实地考察。对前战斗人员、地方领导人以及欧盟、公共机构和民间社会组织 (CSO) 的代表进行了 50 多次访谈。 调查结果 信托基金努力在地方和领土层面建设和平。事实证明,它是一个自信和多元化的工具,在机构间协调、政治对话和地方层面的衔接方面进行了创新。这不仅体现在战略上,也体现在技术上,即开发了极具适应性或推广潜力的创新方法;例如,公 众可获取项目进展指标,广泛使用第三方资金将资源分配给最薄弱或最孤立的民间社会组织,以及 将地区方法纳入项目设计和干预逻辑。 然而,基金受到的限制是,建设和平倡议往往来自中央政府和捐助方,而不是地方行动者。杜克总统的政府不愿履行其对和平的全部承诺:欧盟代表团同样不愿就此向政府提出质疑。 政策影响 欧盟信托基金在哥伦比亚的经验可以为支持其他地方的和平进程提供宝贵的思路,丰富欧盟管理和解决武装冲突的立场和方法。新的工具,如 "欧洲团队倡议 "或 "睦邻、发展和国际合作工具--全球欧洲",侧重于多方利益相关者的协调和国际伙伴关系,可以从哥伦比亚的经验教训中获益匪浅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development Policy Review
Development Policy Review DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Development Policy Review is the refereed journal that makes the crucial links between research and policy in international development. Edited by staff of the Overseas Development Institute, the London-based think-tank on international development and humanitarian issues, it publishes single articles and theme issues on topics at the forefront of current development policy debate. Coverage includes the latest thinking and research on poverty-reduction strategies, inequality and social exclusion, property rights and sustainable livelihoods, globalisation in trade and finance, and the reform of global governance. Informed, rigorous, multi-disciplinary and up-to-the-minute, DPR is an indispensable tool for development researchers and practitioners alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信