{"title":"Introducing the Phenomenological Model of Performance Practice (PMPP): Phenomenological Research Design and the Lived Experience in Performance","authors":"Dionysia Bouzioti","doi":"10.1177/16094069231211142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the use of phenomenological approaches in qualitative research increases in the field of performing arts, their legitimate application as research methods can prove to be challenging. The article introduces the dominant dichotomies and challenges in phenomenological research, such as concerns emerging from the researcher’s position, interdisciplinarity and mixed methods. The paper is addressed to novice researchers, researchers-practitioners and scholars with an interest in the theory of phenomenology. Drawing from a phenomenological research project that examined embodiment in Greek tragedy in the context of performer training and theatre directing, the article illustrates the methodological approach employed both in theory and practice. To this end, it proposes a model of data collection, organisation and analysis in interview design and practice-based research in performance. The proposed model sets subjectivity at its core and invests in the participants’ lived experience in an inclusive manner, concurrently calling on the investigator’s transparency as defined by the Husserlian epochè. It, therefore, comes into an inclusive step-by-step guide based on scientifically evident and ethically approved methods that accumulate Husserl and Giorgi’s phenomenological methods, Schön’s action research combined with Kolb’s reflective practice and tools for findings validation by Colaizzi (1978), Van Manen (1997) and Van Kaam (1966). Finally, in order to make phenomenological interviews more accessible, the article includes an interview schedule, which can be further developed and applied to practice-based research in both physical and digital environments.","PeriodicalId":48220,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While the use of phenomenological approaches in qualitative research increases in the field of performing arts, their legitimate application as research methods can prove to be challenging. The article introduces the dominant dichotomies and challenges in phenomenological research, such as concerns emerging from the researcher’s position, interdisciplinarity and mixed methods. The paper is addressed to novice researchers, researchers-practitioners and scholars with an interest in the theory of phenomenology. Drawing from a phenomenological research project that examined embodiment in Greek tragedy in the context of performer training and theatre directing, the article illustrates the methodological approach employed both in theory and practice. To this end, it proposes a model of data collection, organisation and analysis in interview design and practice-based research in performance. The proposed model sets subjectivity at its core and invests in the participants’ lived experience in an inclusive manner, concurrently calling on the investigator’s transparency as defined by the Husserlian epochè. It, therefore, comes into an inclusive step-by-step guide based on scientifically evident and ethically approved methods that accumulate Husserl and Giorgi’s phenomenological methods, Schön’s action research combined with Kolb’s reflective practice and tools for findings validation by Colaizzi (1978), Van Manen (1997) and Van Kaam (1966). Finally, in order to make phenomenological interviews more accessible, the article includes an interview schedule, which can be further developed and applied to practice-based research in both physical and digital environments.
虽然在定性研究中使用现象学方法在表演艺术领域有所增加,但它们作为研究方法的合法应用可能被证明是具有挑战性的。本文介绍了现象学研究中主要的二分法和挑战,如研究者立场的关注、跨学科性和混合方法。这篇论文是写给对现象学理论感兴趣的新手研究者、研究者实践者和学者的。借鉴现象学研究项目,在表演者培训和戏剧导演的背景下研究希腊悲剧的化身,本文说明了理论和实践中采用的方法论方法。为此,本文提出了一个访谈设计中的数据收集、组织和分析模型以及绩效实践研究模型。所提出的模型以主观性为核心,以包容性的方式投资于参与者的生活经验,同时呼吁研究者的透明度,如胡塞尔廉epochè所定义的那样。因此,它形成了一个包容性的循序渐进的指南,该指南基于胡塞尔和乔吉的现象学方法,Schön的行动研究与科尔布的反思实践相结合,以及Colaizzi (1978), Van Manen(1997)和Van Kaam(1966)的发现验证工具。最后,为了使现象学访谈更容易获得,本文包括一个访谈时间表,可以进一步开发并应用于物理和数字环境中基于实践的研究。
期刊介绍:
Journal Highlights
Impact Factor: 5.4 Ranked 5/110 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary – SSCI
Indexed In: Clarivate Analytics: Social Science Citation Index, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and Scopus
Launched In: 2002
Publication is subject to payment of an article processing charge (APC)
Submit here
International Journal of Qualitative Methods (IJQM) is a peer-reviewed open access journal which focuses on methodological advances, innovations, and insights in qualitative or mixed methods studies. Please see the Aims and Scope tab for further information.