Cognitive Culture and Notions of Truth

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Mustafa I. Bilalov
{"title":"Cognitive Culture and Notions of Truth","authors":"Mustafa I. Bilalov","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-9-45-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides an overview of the primary author’s ideas and publications on forming the concept of “cognitive culture”. It appears as the author’s concept with some components of logically interrelated issues of understanding the sub­ject of cognition, types, genera, and types of cognitive culture, and its relation­ship with the problem of truth. Pointing to his numerous publications, the author argues that refining subjective metrics in modern science and culture is difficult both by the complexity of isolating individual consciousness from the collective one and by the existentialization of subjective operations in which human inter­est is maximized. The author’s work traces the dynamics of the subject in its epistemological and epistemological sections from “elimination of the subject” to “death of the subject”. According to the author of the article, classification into rational and irrational types of cognitive culture is productive in clarifying the connection between truth and knowledge, substantiating the idea of inquiring and extra-knowing existence of truth, which is essential for defining truth. Iden­tifying the complex influence of subjective levels, operational mechanisms, and their creative products on concrete-historical interpretations of truth allows us to establish the correspondence of a particular kind of cognitive culture to the gen­eral concepts of truth. As a result, the philosophical and conceptual understand­ing of truth is quite correctly admissible by the methodology of the polylogue of cognitive cultures.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-9-45-49","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article provides an overview of the primary author’s ideas and publications on forming the concept of “cognitive culture”. It appears as the author’s concept with some components of logically interrelated issues of understanding the sub­ject of cognition, types, genera, and types of cognitive culture, and its relation­ship with the problem of truth. Pointing to his numerous publications, the author argues that refining subjective metrics in modern science and culture is difficult both by the complexity of isolating individual consciousness from the collective one and by the existentialization of subjective operations in which human inter­est is maximized. The author’s work traces the dynamics of the subject in its epistemological and epistemological sections from “elimination of the subject” to “death of the subject”. According to the author of the article, classification into rational and irrational types of cognitive culture is productive in clarifying the connection between truth and knowledge, substantiating the idea of inquiring and extra-knowing existence of truth, which is essential for defining truth. Iden­tifying the complex influence of subjective levels, operational mechanisms, and their creative products on concrete-historical interpretations of truth allows us to establish the correspondence of a particular kind of cognitive culture to the gen­eral concepts of truth. As a result, the philosophical and conceptual understand­ing of truth is quite correctly admissible by the methodology of the polylogue of cognitive cultures.
认知文化与真理观念
本文概述了第一作者关于“认知文化”概念形成的思想和著作。它表现为作者的概念与理解认知主体、认知文化的类型、属、类型及其与真理问题的关系等逻辑相关问题的一些组成部分。作者指出,在他的众多出版物中,提炼现代科学和文化中的主观度量是困难的,因为将个人意识从集体意识中分离出来是复杂的,而且人类利益最大化的主观操作的存在化。作者的作品在其认识论和认识论部分追溯了主体的动态,从“主体的消除”到“主体的死亡”。将认知文化分为理性与非理性两类,有助于厘清真理与知识的关系,充实真理的探究性和超知性存在观,这是确定真理的必要条件。识别主观层面、运作机制及其创造性产物对具体历史真理解释的复杂影响,使我们能够建立特定类型的认知文化与一般真理概念的对应关系。因此,对真理的哲学性和概念性理解被认知文化的多语学方法论所完全正确地接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信