Improper Treatments in the Field of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Clinical Cohort Study of 55 Cases

Behçet EROL, Sercan KÜÇÜKKURT, Nima MOHARAMNEJAD
{"title":"Improper Treatments in the Field of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Clinical Cohort Study of 55 Cases","authors":"Behçet EROL, Sercan KÜÇÜKKURT, Nima MOHARAMNEJAD","doi":"10.5336/dentalsci.2023-98880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To underscore the significance of dentistrybased education in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS), fostering interdisciplinary communication and collaboration for effective treatments. Material and Methods: Fifty five improper OMFS treatment cases directed to us from different centers were investigated. Cases were categorized into dentoalveolar and maxillofacial interventions. Clinical records and patient files were analyzed for age, gender, etiology, improper treatment classification, treating clinician, previous interventions, complications, and orofacial outcomes. Results: During the 25-year survey (1990-2015), 55 out of 12,452 cases were studied. Case ages range from 3 to 70 years (Average: 33.4), with 33 (60%) males and 22 (40%) females. Dentoalveolar interventions accounted for 22 cases, while maxillofacial cases accounted for 33. Private practices performed 32 interventions, whereas state or university hospitals performed 23. Dentists carried out 22 procedures, plastic surgeons 22, and ear nose throat specialists 11. The most common improper treatments were tooth extraction-related (21 cases), followed by jaw fracture treatment (15 cases), and misdiagnosed odontogenic tumor as infection (8 cases). The top 3 reasons for patient referrals were facial asymmetry and malocclusion (21 cases), root migration to anatomical spaces (11 cases), and nerve injury (9 cases). The most common sequelae after the first intervention were facial asymmetry and malocclusion (24 cases), infection in the area (22 cases), and nerve injury (12 cases). Conclusion: Improper treatments are common in OMFS, necessitating awareness among all surgeons. Reducing such cases requires physicians to take responsibility throughout the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases, being fully aware of their authority and skills. Additionally, addressing authority conflicts, improving dentistry-based secondary education, and promoting specialization in the field are vital factors.","PeriodicalId":498139,"journal":{"name":"Türkiye klinikleri diş hekimliği bilimleri","volume":"264 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Türkiye klinikleri diş hekimliği bilimleri","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5336/dentalsci.2023-98880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To underscore the significance of dentistrybased education in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS), fostering interdisciplinary communication and collaboration for effective treatments. Material and Methods: Fifty five improper OMFS treatment cases directed to us from different centers were investigated. Cases were categorized into dentoalveolar and maxillofacial interventions. Clinical records and patient files were analyzed for age, gender, etiology, improper treatment classification, treating clinician, previous interventions, complications, and orofacial outcomes. Results: During the 25-year survey (1990-2015), 55 out of 12,452 cases were studied. Case ages range from 3 to 70 years (Average: 33.4), with 33 (60%) males and 22 (40%) females. Dentoalveolar interventions accounted for 22 cases, while maxillofacial cases accounted for 33. Private practices performed 32 interventions, whereas state or university hospitals performed 23. Dentists carried out 22 procedures, plastic surgeons 22, and ear nose throat specialists 11. The most common improper treatments were tooth extraction-related (21 cases), followed by jaw fracture treatment (15 cases), and misdiagnosed odontogenic tumor as infection (8 cases). The top 3 reasons for patient referrals were facial asymmetry and malocclusion (21 cases), root migration to anatomical spaces (11 cases), and nerve injury (9 cases). The most common sequelae after the first intervention were facial asymmetry and malocclusion (24 cases), infection in the area (22 cases), and nerve injury (12 cases). Conclusion: Improper treatments are common in OMFS, necessitating awareness among all surgeons. Reducing such cases requires physicians to take responsibility throughout the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases, being fully aware of their authority and skills. Additionally, addressing authority conflicts, improving dentistry-based secondary education, and promoting specialization in the field are vital factors.
口腔颌面外科55例临床队列分析
目的:强调牙科学教育在口腔颌面外科(OMFS)中的重要性,促进跨学科的交流与合作,以获得有效的治疗。材料和方法:对来自不同中心的55例不正确的OMFS治疗病例进行调查。病例分为牙槽和颌面干预。分析临床记录和患者档案的年龄、性别、病因、不当治疗分类、治疗临床医生、既往干预措施、并发症和口腔面部预后。结果:在25年的调查期间(1990-2015年),12452例病例中有55例被研究。病例年龄从3岁到70岁不等(平均33.4岁),其中男性33例(60%),女性22例(40%)。牙槽齿干预22例,颌面部干预33例。私人诊所进行了32次干预,而州立或大学医院进行了23次。牙医做了22次手术,整形外科医生做了22次,耳鼻喉专科医生做了11次。最常见的错误治疗是拔牙相关(21例),其次是颌骨骨折治疗(15例),误诊牙源性肿瘤为感染(8例)。患者转诊的前3位原因分别是面部不对称和错颌(21例)、牙根向解剖间隙移位(11例)和神经损伤(9例)。首次干预后最常见的后遗症是面部不对称和错颌(24例)、局部感染(22例)和神经损伤(12例)。结论:治疗不当是OMFS的常见病,应引起外科医生的重视。减少此类病例需要医生在术前、术中和术后各阶段承担责任,充分了解他们的权力和技能。此外,解决权力冲突,改善以牙科为基础的中等教育,促进该领域的专业化是至关重要的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信