Analysis of Multiple Print-Head Displacement Mechanisms in 3D Space for Material Extrusion Machine

IF 2.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Ishant Singhal, Bobby Tyagi, Abhishek Raj, Akash Jain, Shashank Kapoor, Ankit Sahai, Rahul Swarup Sharma
{"title":"Analysis of Multiple Print-Head Displacement Mechanisms in 3D Space for Material Extrusion Machine","authors":"Ishant Singhal, Bobby Tyagi, Abhishek Raj, Akash Jain, Shashank Kapoor, Ankit Sahai, Rahul Swarup Sharma","doi":"10.1089/3dp.2023.0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For wider adoption of the material extrusion (MatEx)-based additive manufacturing (AM) process, it is important to understand the systems for an improved production rate of the machine. This AM process is the most adaptable and popular due to its wide availability, scalability, compatibility with a broad range of thermoplastic materials, and decreasing cost of personal MatEx-based systems. The performance limits are being explored by many researchers, but none have tried to find the efficacy of different kinematic configurations. Kinematic configurations can significantly alter the efficiency of the machines. Most machines are operating on Cartesian positioning systems nowadays. Delta and polar positioning systems are not yet been extensively explored. In this study, Cartesian, delta, and polar systems of MatEx 3D printers are analyzed and compared based on physical inspection, print head dynamics and printed parts surface finish, dimensional accuracy, and build time. Based on the comparative study, the results show that the delta system-based 3D printer gives better surface finish and dimensional accuracy than polar and Cartesian system-based 3D printers. The analysis of build time with respect to the different infill densities and different printing speeds shows that the polar system-based 3D printers performed faster than the other two positing systems.","PeriodicalId":54341,"journal":{"name":"3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2023.0096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For wider adoption of the material extrusion (MatEx)-based additive manufacturing (AM) process, it is important to understand the systems for an improved production rate of the machine. This AM process is the most adaptable and popular due to its wide availability, scalability, compatibility with a broad range of thermoplastic materials, and decreasing cost of personal MatEx-based systems. The performance limits are being explored by many researchers, but none have tried to find the efficacy of different kinematic configurations. Kinematic configurations can significantly alter the efficiency of the machines. Most machines are operating on Cartesian positioning systems nowadays. Delta and polar positioning systems are not yet been extensively explored. In this study, Cartesian, delta, and polar systems of MatEx 3D printers are analyzed and compared based on physical inspection, print head dynamics and printed parts surface finish, dimensional accuracy, and build time. Based on the comparative study, the results show that the delta system-based 3D printer gives better surface finish and dimensional accuracy than polar and Cartesian system-based 3D printers. The analysis of build time with respect to the different infill densities and different printing speeds shows that the polar system-based 3D printers performed faster than the other two positing systems.
材料挤压机三维空间多打印头位移机理分析
为了更广泛地采用基于材料挤压(MatEx)的增材制造(AM)工艺,了解提高机器生产率的系统非常重要。由于其广泛的可用性、可扩展性、与各种热塑性材料的兼容性以及降低个人matex系统的成本,这种增材制造工艺是适应性最强和最受欢迎的。许多研究人员正在探索性能限制,但没有人试图找到不同运动配置的功效。运动学配置可以显著改变机器的效率。现在大多数机器都是在笛卡尔定位系统上操作的。三角洲和极地定位系统尚未得到广泛的探索。在本研究中,基于物理检查、打印头动力学和打印部件表面光洁度、尺寸精度和构建时间,对MatEx 3D打印机的笛卡尔、delta和极坐标系进行了分析和比较。通过对比研究,结果表明基于delta体系的3D打印机比基于极坐标和直角坐标系的3D打印机具有更好的表面光洁度和尺寸精度。对不同填充密度和不同打印速度下的打印时间分析表明,基于极性系统的3D打印机比其他两种定位系统的打印速度更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for world-class research in additive manufacturing and related technologies. The Journal explores emerging challenges and opportunities ranging from new developments of processes and materials, to new simulation and design tools, and informative applications and case studies. Novel applications in new areas, such as medicine, education, bio-printing, food printing, art and architecture, are also encouraged. The Journal addresses the important questions surrounding this powerful and growing field, including issues in policy and law, intellectual property, data standards, safety and liability, environmental impact, social, economic, and humanitarian implications, and emerging business models at the industrial and consumer scales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信