An Experience in Laboratory Diagnosis of Fungal Infections in COVID -19 Patients

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Sushma Yadav Boorgula, Sadhana Yelamanchili, Srinivas Kishore Sistla, Lubna Saher, Deepika Gujjarlapudi, Shalini E., Sindhu Devi V., Nageshwar Reddy Duvvur
{"title":"An Experience in Laboratory Diagnosis of Fungal Infections in COVID -19 Patients","authors":"Sushma Yadav Boorgula, Sadhana Yelamanchili, Srinivas Kishore Sistla, Lubna Saher, Deepika Gujjarlapudi, Shalini E., Sindhu Devi V., Nageshwar Reddy Duvvur","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has cast a gloom spell on healthcare worldwide, infecting millions of people. Objective The aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence and review the contributing comorbidities and the precipitating factors leading to the emergence of the fungal infections in COVID-19-affected patients. To assess the utility of different laboratory techniques for confirmation of fungal infections. To assess the strengths and limitations of the diagnostic methods. Methods We have studied 252 clinical samples obtained from 121 COVID-positive patients. Results Among the 121 patients clinically diagnosed with fungal infections, 88 had diabetes and were given steroids for treatment (p-value = 0.001). Ninety-five patients (78.5%) had a positive laboratory diagnosis (either culture positive, potassium hydroxide [KOH]-positive or positive histopathology report). Fungal culture was positive in 75 (61.9%) patients and histopathology report was positive in 62 (51.2%). Histopathology was positive in 7 (5.8%) patients in whom culture and KOH were negative. Conclusion Aggressive treatment methods, administration of immune suppressants, and antibiotics, with an intention to salvage, have made patients susceptible to the benign fungus, causing it to evade the host immunity, thus leading to invasive infections. Applying different laboratory modalities would not only aid in providing fast and valuable information but also help in understanding the pathology which would assist the clinician in selecting the correct treatment for the patient.","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has cast a gloom spell on healthcare worldwide, infecting millions of people. Objective The aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence and review the contributing comorbidities and the precipitating factors leading to the emergence of the fungal infections in COVID-19-affected patients. To assess the utility of different laboratory techniques for confirmation of fungal infections. To assess the strengths and limitations of the diagnostic methods. Methods We have studied 252 clinical samples obtained from 121 COVID-positive patients. Results Among the 121 patients clinically diagnosed with fungal infections, 88 had diabetes and were given steroids for treatment (p-value = 0.001). Ninety-five patients (78.5%) had a positive laboratory diagnosis (either culture positive, potassium hydroxide [KOH]-positive or positive histopathology report). Fungal culture was positive in 75 (61.9%) patients and histopathology report was positive in 62 (51.2%). Histopathology was positive in 7 (5.8%) patients in whom culture and KOH were negative. Conclusion Aggressive treatment methods, administration of immune suppressants, and antibiotics, with an intention to salvage, have made patients susceptible to the benign fungus, causing it to evade the host immunity, thus leading to invasive infections. Applying different laboratory modalities would not only aid in providing fast and valuable information but also help in understanding the pathology which would assist the clinician in selecting the correct treatment for the patient.
COVID -19患者真菌感染的实验室诊断体会
由严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)引起的冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)给全球医疗保健蒙上了一层阴影,感染了数百万人。目的了解2019冠状病毒病(covid -19)患者真菌感染的流行情况,并对导致真菌感染的合并症和诱发因素进行综述。评估不同实验室技术在确认真菌感染方面的效用。评估诊断方法的优势和局限性。方法对121例新冠肺炎阳性患者的252份临床样本进行分析。结果121例临床诊断为真菌感染的患者中,88例合并糖尿病并给予类固醇治疗(p值= 0.001)。实验室诊断阳性95例(78.5%)(培养阳性、氢氧化钾阳性或组织病理学报告阳性)。真菌培养阳性75例(61.9%),组织病理学报告阳性62例(51.2%)。组织病理学阳性7例(5.8%),其中培养和KOH阴性。结论积极的治疗方法、免疫抑制剂的使用和以抢救为目的的抗生素治疗使患者对良性真菌易感,使其逃避宿主免疫,从而导致侵袭性感染。应用不同的实验室模式不仅有助于提供快速和有价值的信息,而且有助于理解病理,这将有助于临床医生为患者选择正确的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信