Formation of critical thinking personality in the context of the value-sense educational paradigm

Svitlana Bader, Mariia Pochynkova
{"title":"Formation of critical thinking personality in the context of the value-sense educational paradigm","authors":"Svitlana Bader, Mariia Pochynkova","doi":"10.12958/2227-2844-2023-4(358)-35-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the problem of the formation of critical thinking of an individual in the context of the value-sense paradigm of education. The authors provide a thorough description of the essence of the value-sense educational paradigm, the leading ideas of which are defined as: the natural urge of the individual to learn based on internal meanings without presenting ready-made knowledge and facts, but through meaningful learning and “discovery” of knowledge; personality is unique and unique with its own set of values and meanings, and also, in fact, personality produces values and in the educational process there is a kind of mutual exchange of values; mutual exchange of values, and, accordingly, their formation/correction is possible during subject-subject interaction between participants of the educational process, which is what the value-sense paradigm is focused on; the purpose of the educational process is to form a person’s ability to successfully model and, on this basis, realize his future based on values and meanings; the formation of the necessary competences set by society through the legal framework occurs naturally if the individual recognizes the necessary values as meaningful. In turn, the critical thinking of an individual is a type of thinking that cannot be formed in the conditions of outdated (technocratic) paradigms that are focused purely on the knowledge component. After all, critical thinking involves independent “discovery” of knowledge through analysis, reflection, generalization, revision of the formed point of view if necessary. The authors prove that the leading features of critical thinking (meaningfulness and awareness, reflexivity, purposefulness, reasonableness, self-control, independence, flexibility) can be formed only in such an educational environment that is meaningful for the individual. The implementation of the value-sense paradigm in education allows to form the critical thinking of an individual naturally, taking into account the value orientations of a person, by saturating the educational process with interactive forms and methods of work based on dialogic and partner interaction.","PeriodicalId":486345,"journal":{"name":"Вісник Луганського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вісник Луганського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12958/2227-2844-2023-4(358)-35-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of the formation of critical thinking of an individual in the context of the value-sense paradigm of education. The authors provide a thorough description of the essence of the value-sense educational paradigm, the leading ideas of which are defined as: the natural urge of the individual to learn based on internal meanings without presenting ready-made knowledge and facts, but through meaningful learning and “discovery” of knowledge; personality is unique and unique with its own set of values and meanings, and also, in fact, personality produces values and in the educational process there is a kind of mutual exchange of values; mutual exchange of values, and, accordingly, their formation/correction is possible during subject-subject interaction between participants of the educational process, which is what the value-sense paradigm is focused on; the purpose of the educational process is to form a person’s ability to successfully model and, on this basis, realize his future based on values and meanings; the formation of the necessary competences set by society through the legal framework occurs naturally if the individual recognizes the necessary values as meaningful. In turn, the critical thinking of an individual is a type of thinking that cannot be formed in the conditions of outdated (technocratic) paradigms that are focused purely on the knowledge component. After all, critical thinking involves independent “discovery” of knowledge through analysis, reflection, generalization, revision of the formed point of view if necessary. The authors prove that the leading features of critical thinking (meaningfulness and awareness, reflexivity, purposefulness, reasonableness, self-control, independence, flexibility) can be formed only in such an educational environment that is meaningful for the individual. The implementation of the value-sense paradigm in education allows to form the critical thinking of an individual naturally, taking into account the value orientations of a person, by saturating the educational process with interactive forms and methods of work based on dialogic and partner interaction.
价值意识教育范式下批判性思维人格的形成
本文致力于探讨在教育价值意识范式的背景下,个人批判性思维的形成问题。作者对价值意识教育范式的本质进行了全面的描述,其主要思想定义为:个体基于内在意义学习的自然冲动,而不是提供现成的知识和事实,而是通过有意义的学习和知识的“发现”;人格是独特的、独特的,有自己的一套价值和意义,实际上人格产生价值,在教育过程中存在着一种相互的价值交换;在教育过程参与者之间的主体-主体互动中,价值观的相互交换及其形成/修正是可能的,这是价值意识范式所关注的;教育过程的目的是形成一个人成功塑造的能力,并在此基础上基于价值和意义实现他的未来;如果个人认识到必要的价值是有意义的,那么社会通过法律框架所规定的必要能力的形成就会自然发生。反过来,个人的批判性思维是一种不能在纯粹关注知识成分的过时(技术官僚)范式条件下形成的思维类型。毕竟,批判性思维涉及通过分析、反思、概括、必要时对形成的观点进行修正来独立地“发现”知识。作者证明,批判性思维的主要特征(意义和意识、反身性、目的性、合理性、自制力、独立性、灵活性)只有在这样一个对个人有意义的教育环境中才能形成。在教育中实施价值意识范式,通过以对话和伙伴互动为基础的互动形式和工作方法,使教育过程充满互动形式和方法,从而考虑到个人的价值取向,自然地形成个人的批判性思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信