{"title":"Isotopic (δ13C, δ18O) Analysis of Small Amounts of Carbonate in Silicate Rocks by the Continuous Flow Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry Method","authors":"E. O. Dubinina, Y. N. Chizhova, S. A. Kossova","doi":"10.1134/S0016702923110034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An experimental study of the main factors affecting the accuracy of oxygen and carbon isotopic analysis in carbonates dispersed in silicate matrix is carried out. Artificial 1, 2, 5, and 10% mixtures of quartz with carbonates with different isotopic parameters (KH-2, Ko, MCA-8) were analyzed by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry (CF IRMS). It is established that, in addition to the influence of the instrumental nonlinearity, the results are affected by two factors: trace amounts of CO<sub>2</sub>, constantly present in the system (the blank effect) and the presence of chemically neutral silicate particles (the matrix effect). The blank effect depends on the isotopic parameters of the sample and has very little influence on the estimated carbonate content in the rock. The matrix effect, on the contrary, strongly affects the estimated carbonate content, and produces the isotopic shift towards underestimated contents of heavy <sup>13</sup>C and <sup>18</sup>O isotopes. It is shown that this effect is related to the processes occurring near the CO<sub>2</sub>–acid–quartz interface, which are accompanied by kinetic fractionation of carbon and oxygen isotopes. Both effects are dependent on the amount of silicate matrix in the system and most clearly manifested during analysis of carbonate-poor rocks. When the carbonate content in the rock is about 1–2%, deviations from the true δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>18</sup>O values can reach the first ppm, while carbonate content obtained by chromatographic peak calibration can be underestimated by 20–40%.</p>","PeriodicalId":12781,"journal":{"name":"Geochemistry International","volume":"61 11","pages":"1164 - 1176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S0016702923110034.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemistry International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0016702923110034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An experimental study of the main factors affecting the accuracy of oxygen and carbon isotopic analysis in carbonates dispersed in silicate matrix is carried out. Artificial 1, 2, 5, and 10% mixtures of quartz with carbonates with different isotopic parameters (KH-2, Ko, MCA-8) were analyzed by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry (CF IRMS). It is established that, in addition to the influence of the instrumental nonlinearity, the results are affected by two factors: trace amounts of CO2, constantly present in the system (the blank effect) and the presence of chemically neutral silicate particles (the matrix effect). The blank effect depends on the isotopic parameters of the sample and has very little influence on the estimated carbonate content in the rock. The matrix effect, on the contrary, strongly affects the estimated carbonate content, and produces the isotopic shift towards underestimated contents of heavy 13C and 18O isotopes. It is shown that this effect is related to the processes occurring near the CO2–acid–quartz interface, which are accompanied by kinetic fractionation of carbon and oxygen isotopes. Both effects are dependent on the amount of silicate matrix in the system and most clearly manifested during analysis of carbonate-poor rocks. When the carbonate content in the rock is about 1–2%, deviations from the true δ13C and δ18O values can reach the first ppm, while carbonate content obtained by chromatographic peak calibration can be underestimated by 20–40%.
期刊介绍:
Geochemistry International is a peer reviewed journal that publishes articles on cosmochemistry; geochemistry of magmatic, metamorphic, hydrothermal, and sedimentary processes; isotope geochemistry; organic geochemistry; applied geochemistry; and chemistry of the environment. Geochemistry International provides readers with a unique opportunity to refine their understanding of the geology of the vast territory of the Eurasian continent. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.